Mike Pelfrey, who the Twins will be signing for $11 million over two years, is an investment too. In the long run, heís averaged out to a 4.48 ERA return, but that's like saying a roulette spin will come up blackish-red. Heís thrown about five-and-a-half seasons in the majors, and only once (4.74 ERA in 2011) has he ever come anywhere near that career ERA. Instead, heís crushed it twice (3.72 in 2008 and 3.66 in 2010) and been crushed three times (5.57 in 2007, 5.03 in 2009, 5.19 last year). It doesnít take a lot of advanced analysis to tell you that the Twins are betting against the house.
But the advanced stats tell us the same thing. Pelfreyís success or failure each year has been almost entirely based on how many home runs he has given up. Home runs are highly dependent on whether or not a pitcher tends to be a ground ball pitcher or a fly ball pitcher, and Pelfrey is the latter. Itís hard for any pitcher to control what percentage of those fly balls turn to home runs, but there is some long-term trend to it, and Pelfrey has been very good at keeping fly balls from turning to home runs. Every year he has pitched in the majors, Pelfrey has been in the top half of pitchers in home run to fly ball ratio (HR/FB).
But the two years he was really good, he was elite in HR/FB, ranking 4th among qualified pitchers in 2008 and 9th in 2010. The other years, he wasnít bad, but merely slightly above average. When Pelfrey has been successful, heís been elite at doing something in which pitchers have very limited control. I donít like to call that ďluck,Ē but I also donít like to call a good run at a blackjack table ďluck.Ē I go with ďsecret sauce.Ē But whatever I call it, I donít rely on it.
If this was a one-year deal, I could say that the Twins wonít need to rely on it either. But a multi-year deal changes how teams react. If Pelfrey isnít effective, whether itís luck or skill or the wind blowing out in Target Field (*2) this spring, itís going to be hard to push him out of the rotation. Nobody is going to be anxious to give up on a player with that contract, especially given that Pelfrey is by all accounts a good guy and hard worker.
So the Twins are making a bigger bet than they should have against the house. They might have been emboldened to do so by their success with Kevin Correia, who paid off handsomely in his first year. The Twins have responded by doubling down instead of walking away with their winnings.
Thatís a natural, human reaction. Itís also why they still keep building casinos.
*1) We tend to read numbers and blow right past them, but think about what it means to build a seven BILLION dollar casino. Thatís the value of thirteen of MLB teams, including the Twins, combined. And that money needs to be raised and paid UP FRONT in cash. And itís not like casinos never go bust Ė several of them have over the last decade or ended up being partly built and then stalled out. Just what kind of return do you have to anticipate to make a seven billion dollar bet like that?
*2) Target Field is probably worth addressing. HR/FB rate is also influenced by ballpark, and it would make sense that Target Field would help pitchers, especially right-handed pitchers, in that regard. But itís worth noting that Pelfreyís team, the Mets, also have a home ballpark that has suppressed home runs. For instance, in 2010, the Mets and their opponents hit 110 home runs in CitiField, but 153 home runs on the road.