-
11-12-2012, 11:27 PM #21Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 842
-
11-12-2012, 11:34 PM #22Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 842
gee i remember 91-93,nathan was a quality starter, but now a dam fine closer, still here is a young left handed hitting catcher...
the only reason he was traded was to make room for joe...so after 18 years terry( im not )lyan , has made what a hand full of trades?and most we have been bent over on ....time for the 3 stooges to go
-
11-13-2012, 07:44 AM #23Senior Member All-Star
- Posts
- 1,764
Nathan was a reliever his last year with San Fran...pitched 78 innings, had an ERA under 3.00, had more Ks than IP and had a WHIP a hair over 1.000. The Twins got him and made them their closer, but it's not like there were no signs he'd excel doing that based on what he had already done
-
11-13-2012, 08:13 AM #24Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 966



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks




Reply With Quote
Twins Daily Wants To Promote Your Blog
Twins Daily's mission is to bring attention to Twins bloggers and independent baseball writers, whether they are writing here or not. Why? Because we've been there - hollering into the void. We...
Yesterday, 05:30 PM