-
12-04-2012, 12:06 PM #21
With Gardenhire (it is so hard for me to capitalize his name) managing, there is always going to be a couple of guys to "back up" Plouffe. Utility utility utility. I sure hope they give him the chance to settle in free of injury. He is getting better and you just can't deny those 6 weeks and not give him a shot on a horrible team to take third and shine.
Last edited by h2oface; 12-04-2012 at 05:32 PM. Reason: corrected capitals as requested in a warning email
-
12-04-2012, 12:07 PM #22Member Rookie
- Posts
- 36
i think this statement is mostly true. Gardy loves tinkering with his lineup, whether it is needed or not.
-
12-04-2012, 12:10 PM #23Senior Member All-Star
- Posts
- 1,900
-
12-04-2012, 01:31 PM #24
I'm completely sold on signing Youkilis and moving Plouffe (again).
-
12-04-2012, 01:33 PM #25
-
12-04-2012, 01:45 PM #26Senior Member Triple-A
- Posts
- 495
Ryan is on record that an "infielder will have to fall in our lap", so I don't expect anybody but "a pulse" to compete with Plouffe. They might as well run him out there at 3B and hope that he hits enough to overcome his fielding limitations. Perhaps with another year (or two) of ~25 HRs he could be traded for quality pitching--even one of those "high ceiling Class A guys".
-
12-04-2012, 01:55 PM #27
Other than Hanahan/Chavez....who will now go back to NYY....who else is there? They wont spend on Youk/Reynolds as Gardy isnt an OBP guy but rather an old school BAve guy.
Ryan also said Tue that our 4 current middle infielders are the ones that Mn will go to spring training with. arghhhhh!!!!
-
12-04-2012, 02:02 PM #28Senior Member All-Star
- Posts
- 1,900
We have no infielders (3B, SS, 2Bs) on our roster that have proven they are capable major league starters. That includes Carroll, the best of the bunch, who I like but is more suited to super utility.
Can any other team in baseball say that?
-
12-04-2012, 02:02 PM #29
-
12-04-2012, 02:46 PM #30Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 507
It would be a huge mistake to bring someone in someone that they would honestly consider playing in front of Plouffe. I have no problem if they tell him it's his spot for a single year, but there's no reason not to give him that chance.
-
12-04-2012, 03:00 PM #31Senior Member Double-A
- Posts
- 124
I bet it's gonna be Hannahan. Can he play 2B?
But a .238 career hitter (.316 OBP)....28 HR in his career...no thanks.
-
12-04-2012, 03:09 PM #32Senior Member All-Star
- Posts
- 1,644
You guys don't honestly think Ryan is going to give a MLB deal to a guy who otherwise will have to wait to get a minor league contract with a ST invite by the other 29 clubs? Hannahan has a whopping .17 better OPS vs. righties than Plouffe does; being a left-handed hitter from MN doesn't mean he's useful. Stay away.
Reports are that Jeff Keppinger is looking at $8M over two years. Why is this guy getting so much less attention than Marco Scutaro, Stephen Drew and Jed Lowrie? The Twins just gave Jamey Carroll 2 years for $6.75M, what the hell.
-
12-04-2012, 03:21 PM #33Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 933
-
12-04-2012, 03:59 PM #34Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 791
+10. It doesn't cost Ryan anything to send a message to Plouffe that he's still closer to a Danny Valencia than a Gary Gaetti in the eyes of the organization at the moment. He's finally shown signs of living up to the potential they saw when they used a first round pick on him waaaayyyy back in 2004, and Ryan doesn't want it going to his head.
On the other hand, it wouldn't be terribly strange to bring in a guy like Hannahan. Like most managers today, Gardy doesn't care much for platooning, especially in the infield. But 250 AB's from JH to spell Plouffe, especially against tough righties, wouldn't be a bad thing. He can also fill in at first and either outfield corner, and can even play second in a pinch. And the Twins have historically loved to bring back local boys in the twilight of their careers, especially in down years.
-
12-04-2012, 04:05 PM #35Senior Member All-Star
- Posts
- 1,900
-
12-04-2012, 04:40 PM #36Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 791
-
12-04-2012, 04:49 PM #37Senior Member All-Star
- Posts
- 1,644
On the other hand, it wouldn't be terribly strange to bring in a guy like Hannahan.[/QUOTE]
But why waste a roster spot in December on the guy who automatically becomes the team's first DFA candidate? If the Twins want him, they can offer him a minor league invite in February, he's most likely not going to get an MLB offer from another team, he's that bad of a hitter.
-
12-04-2012, 05:09 PM #38
I would like Inge or Hannahan, though I'm not sure what Inge would cost. I don't see any reason to bring in Youkilis unless we got an INCREDIBLE deal.
I think it's good to keep Plouffe on his toes, we don't want another Valencia situation where the guy thinks he owns it. But this is a weird situation. You aren't going to have any of those possibilities being sent to the minors to wait, and why take playing time away from a guy who has promise, in a year that should be average at best? We've seen some poor management of playing time for prospects in recent years... I don't see a reason to platoon much in the infield either. Why pigeon-hole a guy this early in his career, and risk eroding his confidence? If we are going to play 5+ AAA players every night, let them play. If they are going to be platooned, let them play every night in Rochester instead.
If Ryan is just letting this get out in the media, smart I suppose. But Plouffe would have to be pretty dumb to think the spot is his already.
-
12-04-2012, 05:09 PM #39Senior Member Big-Leaguer
- Posts
- 791
-
12-04-2012, 05:19 PM #40Senior Member All-Star
- Posts
- 1,644



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote

Twins Minor League Report (6/19): Sano's 1st AA...
The Cedar Rapids Kernels are in the midst of their All-Star break so they were out of action on Wednesday night. This didn't stop the Twins from announcing that one of their top prospects, Max...
Today, 10:44 PM