You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php?r=...z-Kershaw-Path
You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php?r=...z-Kershaw-Path
With all we hear about Berrios, I noticed that Miguel Sulbaran, (acquired in Butera trade) with 9 more innings pitched had a lower ERA, whip, walks, and HR allowed at the same level. Is there any reason why he isn't considered a better prospect? He is also only 2 months older.
Regarding Stewart, one of the things that scouts really liked prior to the draft was his polish. Like Seth said, the combination of his athleticism and a workable 4-pitch arsenal lends itself to moving up quickly, particularly now that he will be focusing on baseball full time. It may make sense to promote Stewart aggressively early on, as he probably can get away with dominating lower levels of the minors with just his fastball and slider, but the higher level of competition will force him to work on and improve his other off-speed offerings.
I've read a few scouts who say they currently like Stewart over any high school pitcher in the 2014 class because of the total package. Some players have better individual tools, but no one (yet) has Stewart's combination of two plus pitches (fastball & slider), a 4-pitch arsenal, good control and elite athleticism. Baseball America did an update to their Best Tools report for the 2013 draft picks a few weeks ago, and Stewart's name was prominent: http://www.baseballamerica.com/draft...draft-classes/
Most important to this conversation, they picked Stewart as the high school player who is "Closest to the Majors". He is also the top-ranked athlete from the draft, has the #2 fastball (after Gray), and his slider is the #5 Secondary pitch.
Has anyone projected Cedar Rapid's starting rotation for next season? There seem to be more names than spots right now. I wonder if they might try tandem starters.
I don't think you can promote the players too quickly. If they've got the raw talent, as soon as they demonstrate they can hold their own at a level they should be pushed again.
Anyone who wants to suggest a player failed due to being pushed too quickly needs to show the player would have succeeded with more time. How can you prove that? You can't. Plenty of talented players fail even when their teams take their time moving them through the system.
I think if players can pitch, they'll pitch. If they can't pitch it's in the teams best interest to find out as quickly as possible. Push them through as fast as possible and if they falter, trade them to a team who believes they just needed a little more time...
I think a very important factor is the state of the MLB team. Mike Matheny wanted to have Michael Wacha as one of his starting five pitchers to START the season. But the Cardinals had tons of depth and the front office was hesitant to have such a long season for him.
The Marlins had nobody. The brought up...8...9 rookies this year?
Fernandez A to Pros. 20
Ozuna went AA to Pros. 22
Yelich went AA to Pros. 21
Marisnick went AA to Pros. 22
Dietrich went AA to Pros. 22
The Twins...if they don't sign too many guys who are just salary hogs for the next couple seasons, could see guys like Baxendale, Meyer, and May by mid-season or sooner this year. Next year could see Sept call ups of Berrios, et al.
Some guys will learn no matter the competition curve. That's why Buxton is rated #1 by every organization. He learns. He learns quickly. Could put him in MLB tomorrow, he may hit .250 in April and May...but, he'd be hitting .300 in August & September.
And, no matter who you talk to about Buxton, as great as his tools are and his talent is, the first thing they talk about is his makeup and his will to be great. That's such a big piece of the puzzle.
My point is I don't see why domination is a requirement. The guys who will be successful in the majors will rise to a challenge (mental makeup). If you move a talented player up a level and he is competitive for three or four starts then go ahead and move him again. Get the talent to the majors ASAP, and if they don't produce you can move them back a level for seasoning. The best way to improve athletic performance is to play with and against people who are better than you are. The Twins should err on the side of aggressive promotion.
[QUOTE=Seth Stohs;178317]Landa, Felix, Rosario, Stewart, Gonsalves, (possibly) Thorpe, Berrios could start there. Slegers could start there.
I think Landa could move quickly. Great velocity and presence. Twins have limited him in Venezuela, so he's pitching in high-leverage situations and doing well.
I don't think age has much to do with the Twins unwillingness to move pitchers. I think experience does however. Stewart probably could have been given a start or two in full season ball but he was only used sparingly in the rookie leagues. Whether he should have been given more than 20 innings pitched in professional ball is the question that should be asked. That's what would be putting a quick advancement in peril, not his actual age.
[QUOTE...Those decision makers (the front office people, the minor league coaching staffs, etc.) are much closer to the pitchers, and who they are. There's so much that we, from a distance, just don't know about the individuals.[/QUOTE]
A little off topic, but I think it relates. From my outside perspective baseball seems like the most hidebound, insular, and incestuous major sport. Tradition is great but I think many baseball professionals, given the choice between winning and sticking with tradition, would pick tradition every time. I've worked in environments that valued continuity over production and baseball sure looks like another example. In what other sport does every team employ the exact same strategy? Football has multiple offensive and defensive philosophies, west coast, the pistol, the 3-4, the 4-3. Basketball can boast the triangle offense, the corner offense, man or zone, etc. Baseball is stretching its limits with a defensive shift or offensive platoon.
What I'm getting at is, just because the Twins coaches and managers have been in the game all their adult lives and are experts in their field doesn't mean they're automatically employing the best methods of producing what the fans want to see, a winning ball club. MLB looks like a prime candidate for a paradigm shift. Right now it's stuck in a self-perpetuating rut. No one gets a boss job until they've demonstrated they've internalized every hoary trope of conventional baseball. There is no innovation, at all.
And as I implied earlier, my paradigm buster would be stomping on the accelerator with the top picks. Meyer should begin the season in the rotation, Stewart should be up by September. Sano should be the opening day third baseman and Buxton should be in centerfield by the all-star break. After three consecutive 90 loss seasons, what do we have to lose? If they fail at the MLB level send them back, and if failure at the major league level is going to permanently impair them they never had the strength of will to succeed anyway. Now's the time to find out, when we can cut our losses and still come out ahead by trading young talented players who were "simply over-promoted" (conventional thinking) for new prospects who may have what it takes to succeed. Slowly working up the promotion ladder a year at a time is fine for low level picks; top talents should be accelerated through the system.
Re: Shimrod's most recent post:
To be fair, there isn't a lot else to do on the field. Pitchers throw pitches that do something different and a hitter has to adjust to that decision, just like a FB or Basketball team makes a play call and the defense has to adjust and react.Quote:
In what other sport does every team employ the exact same strategy? Football has multiple offensive and defensive philosophies, west coast, the pistol, the 3-4, the 4-3. Basketball can boast the triangle offense, the corner offense, man or zone, etc. Baseball is stretching its limits with a defensive shift or offensive platoon.
I don't think that anyone's saying that what the Twins are doing is right all the time. I don't think that the Rays front office or the A's front office think that they've done what's right all of the time. Even within a front office, you know there are debates and varying opinions on how to do things. That happens with the Rays, and it happens with the Twins. What comes out of their mouths, however, is consensus and a team decision, which I would think any team or business would want.Quote:
What I'm getting at is, just because the Twins coaches and managers have been in the game all their adult lives and are experts in their field doesn't mean they're automatically employing the best methods of producing what the fans want to see, a winning ball club.
I guess all I was trying to say is that the Twins personnel is much close to the players than we are. No stat can tell us if a player's makeup will allow him to pitch in AA at age 17 or 18 (or 21 or 25). They know their personnel. Certainly better than you or I. I'm not saying there aren't times I'm frustrated that a certain guy didn't get a promotion at a certain time or whatever, but they aren't making these decisions without good reasoning.
If healthy, I agree that Meyer and Sano could certainly be opening day guys and I do think Buxton will be up right after the Futures Game. But if Stewart is up in September, that would be a bit much. He would be like 19, and lost time already this first year with a shoulder issue.Quote:
And as I implied earlier, my paradigm buster would be stomping on the accelerator with the top picks. Meyer should begin the season in the rotation, Stewart should be up by September. Sano should be the opening day third baseman and Buxton should be in centerfield by the all-star break.
I just think that's such an oversimplification. Again, each player is different. Buxton may be able to handle the big leagues at 20, and he'll likely get that chance next year. But, he's blessed with great makeup. Just like players mature physically at different times, they also mature mentally at different times. A guy like Miguel Sano would likely have struggled more with a quicker advancement because of his strikeout rate but also because he needed some maturing. Everyone knew it and saw it. Because of that, I don't believe the push-push-push and if they can't hack it, it means they never could have philosophy.Quote:
After three consecutive 90 loss seasons, what do we have to lose? If they fail at the MLB level send them back, and if failure at the major league level is going to permanently impair them they never had the strength of will to succeed anyway. Now's the time to find out, when we can cut our losses and still come out ahead by trading young talented players who were "simply over-promoted" (conventional thinking) for new prospects who may have what it takes to succeed.
Aaron Hicks has great makeup too. He struggled in his big league debut. Does that mean the Twins should give up on him? Brian Dozier didn't get up to the big leagues until he was 24! That's too old, right? Then he struggled. Give up on him too, right? Dozier is incredibly strong mentally. It's such an individual thing that I would hate to pigeonhole everyone into the same plan. It can't happen that way.
Seth...a while ago you indicated that the correct name for Felix, was Jorge Felix. Since, you have often used Felix Jorge, although today was Felix (last name). Which is it?