01-21-2014, 12:08 PM #1
- Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
BA: Radcliff on Engelb Vielma
He speaks really glowingly on Vielma's defense.
Of course his bat needs a lot of work which is why he's not really on too many people's radar. Radcliffe says he's got a good approach but has trouble generating any kind of bat speed. It's possible that this changes as he matures.
Interesting guy to keep an eye on.
Last edited by 2wins87; 01-21-2014 at 12:10 PM.
01-21-2014, 12:24 PM #2
Radcliff is the guy who was responsible for the signing of another Twins' SS. From here (from right after the signing in 2010) :
Twins vice president for player personnel Mike Radcliff said the Twins have been scouting Nishioka for four or five years. Radcliff said Japanese professional players usually aren't eligible to be signed by American teams for about seven years."For the last couple of years, we focused on him because it was pretty well known that he eventually would come to the States," Radcliff said. "We've had two, three scouts see him every year."The Twins, Radcliff said, like his speed and athleticism.
"And the chance to steal bases and range," he said. "We hope he's going to hit. He's like Punto, but we hope he hits a lot more than that."That's the big difference."
So I would take what Radcliff says with a huge grain of salt...
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
01-21-2014, 12:52 PM #3
Thrylos, did you just look that up, or do you have a stock of Twins Front Office and Manager quotes just stocked away for when there are articles on players, such as GCL SS Engelb Vielma??
I guess I'd take what Mike Radcliff says pretty seriously since he is the Director of Player Personnel, so if there's a player in the Twins system, he probably knows him pretty well.
01-21-2014, 01:13 PM #4
- Liked 54 Times in 35 Posts
Nishi = Punto? Close enough in many people's eyes. There are many who don't care for Punto.
Notice the quote "We hope" in there. How many players past having success at the AA/AAA level fail at MLB level?
Last edited by old nurse; 01-21-2014 at 01:15 PM.
This user likes old nurse's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:
01-21-2014, 02:52 PM #5
- Liked 77 Times in 58 Posts
- Blog Entries
Radcliffe...did say on Nishi...in the Punto comparison..."we hope he can hit..."
But this Vielma...as of now, definitely will have to come a long ways offensively to even be Florimon 2.0.
Still, a nice find - I had no idea who this kid was/is.
01-21-2014, 04:28 PM #6
We might have been OK if they stuck Jim &*^%! Hoey at SS, too, just to try and get some value out of that trade, since they don't seem to know the difference between a SS and a horses rear end anyway.
Sorry for the rant, but if you use the Punto hate out of context, some of us will feel obligated to remind everyone of the context.
01-21-2014, 04:49 PM #7
01-21-2014, 08:04 PM #8
- Liked 173 Times in 107 Posts
- Blog Entries
Radcliffe is probably the only scout to make a mistake on a player. Certainly worth distracting from the BAA article.
2wins87- Thanks for the link. It will be interesting following him. The Twins don't appear to have many great defenders at SS in the system. Goodrum? Santana?
01-30-2014, 01:34 PM #9
In light of the Vielma discussion in the Keith Law thread, I'm bumping this.
Looks like Law may agree with Radcliff.
01-30-2014, 01:38 PM #10
Of all the tools I want to see in a raw prospect, bat speed is among the top. If you don't have bat speed, you're offensive upside is Drew Butera, who could always put the bat on the ball, but it wouldn't go anywhere."If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."
01-30-2014, 01:54 PM #11
- Liked 380 Times in 233 Posts
01-30-2014, 02:01 PM #12
- Liked 84 Times in 63 Posts
Taking a cheap shot at Radcliffe is small. Anyone with even a modicum of baseball knowledge who saw Nishi tape from Japan can see how glaringly different he was here in the States. What caused it? Personal turmoil? Culture shock? Gardenhire? Most of us don't think we have the answer...
So, I think we can take in Radcliffe's comments on Vielma without a single grain of salt and accept it for what it is: observations of a 17-year old kid in the lowest levels of the minors who stands out.
Radcliffe has said nice things about players who became stars, too, so it's pretty hard to know when to pick up the saltshaker, isn't it?
Last edited by birdwatcher; 01-30-2014 at 02:07 PM.
01-30-2014, 03:41 PM #13
Man, I mean he must have one of the best gloves at SS in the minors if Keith Law places him at #11 on his Twins prospect list.Scouting Report: Tools - Power: 30, Hitting: 50, Arm: 60, Defense: 40, Speed: 40. "Line drive swing and shows good contact and on-base abilities. Double's power at his peak. Strong arm from 2B or the OF, stiff hands. Not a fast runner, but above average instincts on the bases. Skinny body doesn't look the part, but can sneak up on you. ACL surgery sapped much of his athleticism." (Probably)
Spring Training Regular since 2011.
01-30-2014, 09:34 PM #14
- Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'm very pleased to learn that I wasn't the only one to do a double-take at the sight of the name "Engelb Vielma." Will follow his box scores this season, though it appears that his strengths won't show up there.
01-30-2014, 10:11 PM #15
Obviously we'll see how he does going forward, but ranking Engelb Vielma #11 is kind of silly. To think that he's ahead of Kepler, Walker, Harrison and even some of those hard-throwing relievers... just strange.
01-30-2014, 10:47 PM #16
1. Jason Veritek
2. Dan Sarafini
3. Jesse Fillgrove
4. Marc Barcello
5. Kelcey Mucker
6. Travis Miller
7. Travis Lee
8. Ryan Mills
9. BJ Garbe
10. Adam Johnson
11. Aaron Heilman
12. Matt Moses
13. Steve Waldrop
14. Jay Rainville
15. Henry Sanchez
16. Carlos Guitierrez
17. Shooter Hunt
Those are just the first rounders or sandwich picks who were drafted by Radcliff and who didn't succeed with the Twins. Johnson, Miller and Waldrop were the only ones to actually make it to the majors with the Twins, and none produced first round talent. Seventeen players in 15 years drafted in the first or sandwich rounds never made a difference with the team. Pathetic.
That doesn't count other poor drafts, like 2006, which produced very little major league talent. Or 2007, in which he basically drafted three rounds lower than he could have to save the team money.
He is a Peter Principle poster child. In just about any other market, he would have been run out of town. Here, he was promoted. The best thing that happened to the franchise was when he was promoted into a role that has little influence and they put Johnson in charge of the draft. Since then, the system has gone from worst to first.
So, no, I don't take what says Radcliff did seriously. And I think much less of Law for doing so."If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."
01-30-2014, 11:37 PM #17
- Liked 52 Times in 33 Posts
- Blog Entries
01-31-2014, 12:55 AM #18
- Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I agree with your comments for the most part, but there is no need to make Radcliffe's record worse than it really is.
First, while I think signability is part of the evaluation, lumping Travis Lee, Varitek and Heilman into the same category as Moses, Sanchez and Hunt is a little harsh.
Second, excluding credit for Hunter, Walker, Redman, Cuddyer, Mauer, Span, Plouffe, Perkins, Garza, etc. might be fashionable, but probably not fair when highlighting all of the stinkers. For instance, Mauer over Prior wasn't a no-brainer. Just as it's hard to be overly negative on some consensus type picks, such as Ryan Mills.
Finally, and I hate to mention it because he was shelled while in the show, but Serafini spent some time in the big leagues with us.
By the way, Adam Johnson has to be in the bottom quarter of all-time #2 overall picks....for some reason that pick still hurts the most.
01-31-2014, 06:27 AM #19
- Liked 105 Times in 77 Posts
Mauer over prior wasn't a no-brainer? Hmm, Prior--demanding $20MM to sign vs Mauer--local kid in a town that worships everything "hometown", who definately will sign for much less. No-brainer.
Hunter and Cuddyer can fairly be called "successes", but the rest on your list are indicative of the talent available in the first round. It is expected that executives are held to the high standard of "what have you done for me lately?" Quite frankly it is surprising that he stayed-on after the debacles of the Garbe and Johnson selections.
01-31-2014, 07:56 AM #20"If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."