Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Ervin Santana at 3/40

  1. #1
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    158
    Like
    11
    Liked 22 Times in 20 Posts

    Ervin Santana at 3/40

    http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2014/0...ns-tigers.html

    Who knows how accurate this is but according to Bob Dutton 3/40 is what Santana is likely to get after seeing the Garza contract. Would it be worth the Twins to explore a 3/40 deal for Santana and plan to trade Correia. Even if all you get is your money back for Correia who cares? Nolasco, Santana, Hughes, Pelfrey, Gibson/Deduno/Worley/Diamond wouldn't look too bad huh?

    Looking back at Santana, he's been incredibly good and reliable the 3 of the last 4 years. In 2012 his HR Rate was almost double his career rate. Other than that he's had a solid ERA every year, pitched over 200 innings and made a minimum of 30 starts. Not sure why his HR spiked in 2012 but who cares.

    Maybe Dutton is way off base though too. Santana doesn't have the injury history but does come with the draft pick compensation and has that one bad year out of the last four. I think he'd be worth the risk. Nolasco/Santana would be a decent 1-2 to run out there the next couple years while waiting for Meyer and Gibson to develop.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Brad Swanson's Avatar
    Posts
    548
    Like
    35
    Liked 46 Times in 23 Posts
    Blog Entries
    143
    I'm not the biggest Santana fan, but it's hard to argue that he wouldn't be a huge upgrade over Correia. At 3/40, I'd sign that deal. I'd probably even go 3/45 if that's what it took.
    Works on contingency? No, money down!
    Kevin Slowey was Framed!

  3. #3
    Super Moderator All-Star
    Posts
    3,394
    Like
    160
    Liked 301 Times in 179 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Santana's problem is health... I'd take him over Pelfrey or KC in a heartbeat in terms of upside. Not sure if I'd part with a pick on him though.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    158
    Like
    11
    Liked 22 Times in 20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by diehardtwinsfan View Post
    Santana's problem is health... I'd take him over Pelfrey or KC in a heartbeat in terms of upside. Not sure if I'd part with a pick on him though.
    I had heard that two but he's pitched over 30 starts the past four years and only one year did he fail to eclipse the 200 IP mark. That was 2012 when he still pitched 178 innings. So I don't think health is much of an issue at all. I suppose it's likely he was suffering through an injury in 2012 which may have lead to the poor statistics but still 3 of 4 good years is solid for a starting pitcher.

  5. This user likes halfchest's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (01-27-2014)

  6. #5
    Senior Member All-Star cmathewson's Avatar
    Posts
    1,815
    Like
    128
    Liked 273 Times in 178 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by halfchest View Post
    I had heard that two but he's pitched over 30 starts the past four years and only one year did he fail to eclipse the 200 IP mark. That was 2012 when he still pitched 178 innings. So I don't think health is much of an issue at all. I suppose it's likely he was suffering through an injury in 2012 which may have lead to the poor statistics but still 3 of 4 good years is solid for a starting pitcher.
    Based on his history, health is relatively good. The question is whether that will continue. Is he a ticking time bomb? The Twins had the same issue with Garza. In that sense, a 3-year deal is more palatable than Garza's four-year deal. Personally, I would do it.
    "If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."

  7. #6
    I'd do 3-$40 for Santana but only if they trade KC or can go back in time and not sign Pelfrey. I really want Gibson/others to have a shot of winning a spot out of ST. But a good chane would exist that Santana would be our best starter. With that rotation and a little growth in the lineup (Arcia mashes, Plouffe is slightly above terrible, Willingham rebounds) the Twins could be pretty exciting this year.

  8. #7
    Senior Member All-Star Willihammer's Avatar
    Posts
    2,340
    Like
    227
    Liked 170 Times in 96 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Its not often you get the chance to poach the no.2 starter off a team in front of you in the standings. Either Santana or Ubaldo would be terrific signings.

  9. #8
    Pixel Monkey MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    6,669
    Like
    32
    Liked 739 Times in 413 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    I don't like Ervin Santana. Never have for some reason.

    With that said, I don't know how you pass him up at that price.

  10. #9
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    3,156
    Like
    19
    Liked 194 Times in 122 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Beauchamp View Post
    I don't like Ervin Santana. Never have for some reason.

    With that said, I don't know how you pass him up at that price.
    I agree with this. Still, while his health hasn't caused him to miss time recently, as far as I know he still has been pitching with a torn UCL for about five years. Is that something that will eventually give out? A cynical person may think it finally gets worked on after he finally gets his big payday, not that I'm that cynical person.

  11. #10
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    192
    Like
    105
    Liked 22 Times in 15 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Twins need more offense. Would be a good pickup with 30 or more starts, but, would have 4 FA SP signings so if a couple of young SP catch fire they could be stuck in the minors. Might have been better to have signed Santana than having signed Hughes.

  12. #11
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    Compare Nolascos last 4 years with Santanas, and what do you see?
    Pretty simple if you ask me.

  13. #12
    Senior Member Triple-A amjgt's Avatar
    Posts
    333
    Like
    13
    Liked 34 Times in 24 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cmathewson View Post
    Based on his history, health is relatively good. The question is whether that will continue. Is he a ticking time bomb? The Twins had the same issue with Garza. In that sense, a 3-year deal is more palatable than Garza's four-year deal. Personally, I would do it.
    Based on that logic, what player isn't an injury risk?

    Injury history? - The guy can't stay healthy
    No injury history? - The guy is due for an injury

  14. These 2 users like amjgt's post and want to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    halfchest (01-27-2014), johnnydakota (01-27-2014)

  15. #13
    Pixel Monkey MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    6,669
    Like
    32
    Liked 739 Times in 413 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    It should be noted that in the case of Santana, the second round pick shouldn't even be a consideration. Whatever you'd get in the second round is probably going to be inferior to what you'll get for Correia in trade (and if they pick up another pitcher, they're almost obligated to move Correia to another team to clear up at least one spot for Worley/Diamond/Gibson/Deduno).

  16. This user likes Brock Beauchamp's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (01-27-2014)

  17. #14
    Senior Member All-Star Willihammer's Avatar
    Posts
    2,340
    Like
    227
    Liked 170 Times in 96 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by nicksaviking View Post
    I agree with this. Still, while his health hasn't caused him to miss time recently, as far as I know he still has been pitching with a torn UCL for about five years. Is that something that will eventually give out? A cynical person may think it finally gets worked on after he finally gets his big payday, not that I'm that cynical person.
    He has gotten this far, maybe its a non-issue at this point.

    Heck R.A. Dickey has no UCL at all.

  18. #15
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Beauchamp View Post
    I don't like Ervin Santana. Never have for some reason.

    With that said, I don't know how you pass him up at that price.
    The real question is, what would we have to pay for him? with the Yankees and Dodgers showing interest, im guessing we will have to out bid them ....Apperently 8 teams have interest in Santana , so he probally will either go where he has the best chance to win , or to the highest dollar,since we cant offer the 1st, we will have to out bid the rest if we want him

  19. #16
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    158
    Like
    11
    Liked 22 Times in 20 Posts
    All this said, and I started the thread, I don't think the Twins are interested. I guess you never know but I haven't seen them linked to him recently. Just wanted others opinions on if he goes that cheap. It's a far cry from the 100 million he was supposedly demanding at the beginning of FA

  20. #17
    Senior Member All-Star cmathewson's Avatar
    Posts
    1,815
    Like
    128
    Liked 273 Times in 178 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by amjgt View Post
    Based on that logic, what player isn't an injury risk?

    Injury history? - The guy can't stay healthy
    No injury history? - The guy is due for an injury
    Well, in his case, he has had some elbow issues. Reports are he has been pitching with a partially torn UCL for some time. That is like Garza, who has a screw holding his UCL to the bone. They are both ticking time bombs. More innings means more wear and tear.
    "If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."

  21. This user likes cmathewson's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    thetank (01-27-2014)

  22. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Beauchamp View Post
    I don't like Ervin Santana. Never have for some reason.

    With that said, I don't know how you pass him up at that price.
    This.

    For some reason, I've never been a fan of his. That being said, at that price, I'd be keen to giving him a chance. The team would have to find a taker for one of their fringe starters, but other than that, I don't see why the Twins would make this move if that's the cost associated with Santana.

    It makes KC worse and improves the Twins - I'm all for it!

  23. #19
    Pixel Monkey MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    6,669
    Like
    32
    Liked 739 Times in 413 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by iTwins View Post
    It makes KC worse and improves the Twins - I'm all for it!
    I know this isn't the driving force behind you wanting Santana but I don't like this kind of thinking... Teams should do what's best for their franchise, not worry about how it impacts rivals. That kind of thinking leads to moves like signing Jacoby Ellsbury for a gajillion dollars through his age 147 season.

    Really, I don't care about the deal's impact on Kansas City. I care about whether it's a good value for the Twins.

    It's the same reason why I commend the Twins for taking what they perceive to be the BPA every draft. Drafting around "future needs" means you spend every draft chasing your own tail instead of just taking the player that has the most talent.

  24. #20
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    158
    Like
    11
    Liked 22 Times in 20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by iTwins View Post

    It makes KC worse and improves the Twins - I'm all for it!
    Now if we could just get Sale from the Sox and Verlander from the Tigers

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.