01-27-2014, 01:52 PM #1
Projections have Twins headed for fourth-straight 90-loss season
Clay Davenport, a co-founder of Baseball Prospectus, has released his initial projections for the 2014 season and, ooh boy, the Twins are not faring well. According to his calculations, the Twins will finish the year in last in the AL Central and, once again, lose 90 games.
How is that possible?
Offensively, Davenport expects the Twins to score just 669 runs – the lowest in the American League. Among those his system does not favor includes Kurt Suzuki (.233/.295/.350) as well as heavy regression for Joe Mauer (from an OPS of 880 to 765). Positively, his projections show Josh Willingham and Oswaldo Arica taking significant steps forward.
On the other side of the ball, the projections suggest that the Twins will allow 752 runs – the second-highest total in the American League. As far as the pitching goes, the current four horsemen of the Twins rotation – Ricky Nolasco, Phil Hughes, Mike Pelfrey and Kevin Correia – are estimated to go 34-46 with a 4.45 ERA.
The Twins have been vocal in saying that they are not finished shopping for the offseason so the projection could change but, as of right now, math is not in their corner.
01-27-2014, 01:55 PM #2
It's pretty hard to take anything he's saying seriously when there's something so completely insane mixed in with the other, more valid, points.
01-27-2014, 01:59 PM #3
Other than lingering concussion symptoms (which don't really seem to exist), does he give any reason for the Mauer drop?
I just don't see it happening (and heaven knows i haven't been Mauer's biggest fan).
01-27-2014, 02:08 PM #4
Losing 90 again wouldn't surprise me, and I do expect the Twins offense to be ratty, at best. Someone will need to explain to me how Mauer will fall off a cliff offensively, though.
01-27-2014, 02:08 PM #5
I know this is shallow but everything he says is discredited by that .765 OPS for Mauer. AbsurdBring a song and a smile for the banjo,
Better get while the gettin's good
Catch a ride to the end of the highway
Where the neons turn to wood
01-27-2014, 02:14 PM #6
Mauer's injury seasons play a substantial role in his projection along with, I assume, the aging comparable players:
Run a computerized projection scheme, using the last three years of player performance compared against a database of all players’ four year performances. The algorithm attempts to find the most similar players, in terms of age, position, build, and performance, and the top 20 players are noted on the individual player cards.
01-27-2014, 02:14 PM #7
The only thing I can think of is that it isn't really a comment on Mauer but a comment on what Mauer can do given the dreck surrounding him.
01-27-2014, 02:16 PM #8
Was this written in Washington state or in Colorado? TOKE TOKE TOKE
01-27-2014, 02:17 PM #9
The dip appears to be batting average driven, for whatever reason.
72 wins is about right from where I sit, maybe closer to 75.
This user likes TheLeviathan's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:
01-27-2014, 02:22 PM #10
Yeah, Mauer having his statistically worst (healthy) year after moving to a less demanding position doesn't make a ton of sense.
What is also troubling is our biggest power threat hits only 20 HRs and we don't have a base stealer that can swipe more than 12 bases. Lets hope Terry Ryan isn't done yet!
01-27-2014, 02:24 PM #11
Well, it's certainly possible - but I don't think it's likely. With the team as it currently stands (which I don't believe is finished yet, perhaps it's wishful thinking, but I still think another FA is coming) I think they'll win close to 75 games.
The Mauer OPS drop seems harsh (and a bit unfounded). All the starting staff has to do is be league average and the team should bump into the 73-75 win range. If a few offensive pieces click (Willingham bounce back, a full season of good Plouffe, Arcia getting hot or Hicks having a 2013 Dozier-like resurgence, for example) and this team could battle for .500
01-27-2014, 02:24 PM #12
01-27-2014, 02:29 PM #13
01-27-2014, 02:43 PM #14
01-27-2014, 02:59 PM #15
- Liked 103 Times in 75 Posts
It seems to me people are more upset with a projection of a sub-par Mauer season than with another 90 loss season for the Twins. Without knowing the algorithm used I find it difficult to evaluate his projections. I suspect that team HRs are weighted quite heavily--which penalizes the Twins accordingly. There hasn't been many changes in the Twins hitters to suggest a significant increase in runs scored, and projecting huge improvements from young hitters isn't something I would expect to find in a computer-generated model. Therefore, while many Twins fans expect to see the young hitters make vast improvement in hitting/scoring a that is not something to be expected in a projection-model.
This user likes Kwak's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:
Hosken Bombo Disco (01-27-2014)
01-27-2014, 03:04 PM #16
- Liked 68 Times in 47 Posts
Unless he see's defensive shifts affecting Mauer or an odd injury that forces him to bat right handed, I can't see one of the best batters in baseball doing worse while at 1st base. Maybe with his new twins keeping him up at night he will be too tired to play baseball? The guy has been a rock when healthy since he came into the league. That OPS is a bold prediction and one I would never bet on.
01-27-2014, 03:12 PM #17
•No real leadoff hitter
•No real cleanup hitter
•Weak bottom of the order
•Lots of guys prone to strikeouts
•General lack of clutch hitting
Those were the problems that plagued the Twins last season. We dropped Morneau and added Suzuki and Kubel.
Unless guys like Hicks, Arcia, and Plouffe step up to a higher level, there isn't much to be optimistic about offensively.
01-27-2014, 03:18 PM #18
- Liked 17 Times in 10 Posts
- Blog Entries
I agree with everyone that the Mauer projection doesn't seem very realistic, but I've read numerous places that these projection systems spit out very conservative estimates for aging players, and Mauer is on the wrong side of 30, so he fits that mold. That being said, I would be shocked if that particular projection was correct.
In regards to the team projection, I just don't see how the roster as currently constructed can win 73 games or more and thus avoid losing 90 games again. For this team to even sniff .500, I think a lot of things would have to break the Twins way, including Sano, Meyer, Pinto, Hicks, and maybe even Buxton coming up and being good right away, Dozier not regressing, the free agent pitchers we signed living up to and even exceeding expectations, and having everyone stay healthy. There are just too many question marks in the lineup on Opening Day for me to be very optimistic about the 2014 season in a vacuum (Suzuki, Dozier, Florimon, Plouffe, etc.--basically every position player besides Joe Mauer).I just started the blog Troy Williamson's Hands which is about MN sports and whatever else I want to write--you can find it at http://troywilliamsonshands.blogspot.com/
01-27-2014, 03:29 PM #19
Those things are not to be taken seriously and are heavily influenced by previous seasons' record.
Here are BP's projections for the AL Central in 2011.
Guess which team their projections had to win the division?-----
Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
01-27-2014, 03:29 PM #20
- Liked 42 Times in 30 Posts
- Blog Entries
Everyone is entitled to their own predictions. I really wouldn't be surprised to see the Twins lose 90 again, especially if the pitchers that Ryan signed continue to perform like they have instead of how they all hope to. I predict just the opposite for Joe Mauer. I think he will finally put on his big boy pants and use his size and strength. By having fresher and stronger legs under him from playing first base, he will start hitting the ball about 10 to 15 feet farther, and have an OPS above 1.000, hit 30 to 40 homers, and become a well rounded hitter that can use his "perfect stroke" to hit it out instead of collecting another double. I just think he can evolve, and surprise everyone as he starts his second career at first.