Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 152

Thread: Projections have Twins headed for fourth-straight 90-loss season

  1. #21
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    145
    Like
    2
    Liked 13 Times in 8 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by h2oface View Post
    he will start hitting the ball about 10 to 15 feet farther, and have an OPS above 1.000, hit 30 to 40 homers
    I mean, yeah, that'd be sweet and all, but lets be realistic here. He's hit 32 HRs in the last 4 years combined, never once hit above 30 in a season (28 in 2009, but most besides that is 13 in 06 - 8 years ago), only OPS'd above 900 twice (one of those being the 2009 outlier and the other also in 2006). What you're suggesting is basically that Mauer is going to turn into the Minnesota Miguel Cabrera, if you're expecting his HR power to suddenly triple to quadruple and his OBP and BA to stay at all similar to his career norms.

  2. #22
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,388
    Like
    50
    Liked 35 Times in 23 Posts
    re:Mauer's projection

    We don't know what projection system he is using to derive his predictions. Some of them emphasize regression to the mean very significantly. Beyond that there are some very good reasons that he is projecting Joe to have a down year.

    First, as others have said, Joe is being compared to other 31 year olds who are entering their decline phase. Second, Joe's injury plagued year when he OPS'd .729 is being included in the data that drove the prediction, that is surely going to cause a regression to his statistics. Third, Joe had a high BABIP, it was .383 last season (.300 is about average) and a regression to the mean looks to be in order causing all of his stats to suffer. Fourth, Joe's K% has been steadily increasing over the last 3 years, from 11% to 18%.

    It really isn't surprising that the math predicts Mauer to significantly regress considering the inputs.

  3. #23
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    426
    Like
    0
    Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Oxtung View Post
    re:Mauer's projection

    We don't know what projection system he is using to derive his predictions. Some of them emphasize regression to the mean very significantly. Beyond that there are some very good reasons that he is projecting Joe to have a down year.

    First, as others have said, Joe is being compared to other 31 year olds who are entering their decline phase. Second, Joe's injury plagued year when he OPS'd .729 is being included in the data that drove the prediction, that is surely going to cause a regression to his statistics. Third, Joe had a high BABIP, it was .383 last season (.300 is about average) and a regression to the mean looks to be in order causing all of his stats to suffer. Fourth, Joe's K% has been steadily increasing over the last 3 years, from 11% to 18%.

    It really isn't surprising that the math predicts Mauer to significantly regress considering the inputs.
    While .300 may be average, Mauer has a career average of .349 for BABIP. In fact he has never been below .300 and the only time he was .300 was his rookie season. Other than that his low is .319, which he did twice.

    Since Mauer doesn't hit a lot of home Runs or Strike Out, he will have a high BABIP as those are the "negatives" in the formula.

  4. #24
    I have a hard time swallowing projections like this. In a 100 years I cannot imagine Mauer going backwards in OPS. It anything manning 1st base should result in beefed up numbers all around. We will be seeing greater productivity from Plouffe, Floriman, Dozier, Hicks, Arcia etc. this year. It is Tom Kelly's maxim that a hitter needed 1500 to 2000 ABs before they hit their stride. We will see if that is true with these players. I would love to see Sano, Buxton and Meyer make the team sometime this year. I see having a great outfield defense with Hicks and Buxton out there sometime this year. I see their pitchers reaping some benefit from an improved defense. How much? Let's say 5% to 8%. I see our starting pitchers going deeper into their starts and less wear and tear on the bullpen. Now will all of this result in a winning season? Beats me! I do think they will win 74-77 games. I see 2014 setting the stage for 2015 when we will see a more mature Twins team on the field with Pinto, Sano, Buxton, Arcia and Hicks as fulltime players and maybe Rosario is on the team in some role. We should also see Meyers, Gibson and May playing larger roles. This team has more potential talent than the 1982-1986 teams that won two World Series and we have front row seats in watching them mature and realize their potential. I cannot wait for the day when the rest of the talent has arrived like Thorpe, and Berrios and Kepler and Santana. I will enjoy watching them stick it to the Yankees and the American League East. I have friends who are Yankee fans who have been rubbing it in for the past ten+ years and it is time they got what they have coming to them. I will just sit back and smile.
    Last edited by dakotanative; 01-27-2014 at 04:09 PM. Reason: typo

  5. #25
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    155
    Like
    6
    Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
    Look at the same system's conservative projections for Miguel Cabrera. This system doesn't predict anyone to be a star.

    The concern in the projections is pitching. They spent an awful large amount of money to tread water.

  6. #26
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    613
    Like
    37
    Liked 94 Times in 56 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by dakotanative View Post
    I see 2014 setting the stage for 2015 when we will see a more mature Twins team on the field with Pinto, Sano, Buxton, Arcia and Hicks as fulltime players and maybe Rosario is on the team in some role. We should also see Meyers, Gibson and May playing larger roles.
    The team won't be more mature with those guys, but more fun to watch. I can easily see 90 losses this season the way it sits and am hoping Sano makes it out of spring training, along with Pinto and Arcia, Buxton joins in June with perhaps Meyer, and Hicks sometime this year. 90 losses would be easier to take with the young guys as to the same o, same o as the last few years.

  7. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by DJL44 View Post
    The concern in the projections is pitching. They spent an awful large amount of money to tread water.
    By "tread water" do you mean "barely stay alive" or "comfortably keep oneself from drowning?" Last year was more of the former and I'm hoping this year is more of the latter.

  8. These 2 users like VandyTwinsFan's post and want to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    JB_Iowa (01-27-2014), Kevin (01-28-2014)

  9. #28
    Senior Member Triple-A Steve Lein's Avatar
    Posts
    434
    Like
    8
    Liked 20 Times in 9 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    So outside of his injury riddled season, he expects Mauer to have his worst season ever after moving from catcher to 1B?!

    Count me in the corner of those who finds this laughable.
    Follow me on Twitter: @HangingSL
    Spring Training Regular since 2010.

  10. #29
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,388
    Like
    50
    Liked 35 Times in 23 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SweetOne69 View Post
    While .300 may be average, Mauer has a career average of .349 for BABIP. In fact he has never been below .300 and the only time he was .300 was his rookie season. Other than that his low is .319, which he did twice.

    Since Mauer doesn't hit a lot of home Runs or Strike Out, he will have a high BABIP as those are the "negatives" in the formula.
    Yup, but all a projection system is going to see is that absurdly high BABIP and determine that he is ripe for regression. Frankly after looking at it a little closer I think he is going to regress as well. Will he OPS .750? That's probably a bit severe but I also don't think he'll approach .900 either. His K% is very concerning at first glance and he isn't going to have a .383 BABIP this season again to help obscure his increasing contact problems (in comparison to his previous seasons). The good thing though is that his BB% remains very strong. It's also possible that he hits more home runs since he's not getting beat up as much.

  11. #30
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    Fangraph has the Twins rotation ranked 28th as it sits now .....if the planets dont line up , it could be another 90+ loss season, just saying

  12. #31
    Junior Member Rookie
    Posts
    21
    Like
    5
    Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
    Projections are just that - projections. I usually don't get too worked up about them and especially regarding the Twins b/c I'm a homey. However, after just a just review of their projections I found the following areas that I would also question besides Mauer's expected regression.
    1. Joe is predicted to play 138 games - at 1B ???
    2. The 669 runs scored by the Twins would be 4th in the NL.
    3. Only 2 teams are projected to win 90 ob games; Detroit-91 & St Louis-90.
    4. The CWS is expected to be 3rd in the AL central?!?!?
    I'm sure there are more that seem a bit of a stretch. Point is: This projections is as satisfying as that empty beer can in the trash can. Bartender, a round for everyone.

  13. #32
    Junior Member Rookie
    Posts
    21
    Like
    5
    Liked 14 Times in 7 Posts
    Correction. Add Tampa to #3 with 90.

  14. #33
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    880
    Like
    109
    Liked 131 Times in 60 Posts
    I would bet that Mauer is being projected for typical catcher regression, even though he won't be catching anymore.

    Aside from that, I don't think losing another 90 games is outlandish. I don't think we've improved very much at all. I am not a Hughes or Nolasco fan at all. I don't really expect Hughes to be better than any of the garbage we've been running out there. Nolasco is better but I would think the improvement from having him would be offset by regression from Correia, Fien, Swarzak ,Thielbar.

    The offense remains putrid and lost its second best player. Ryan spent money this off-season which is good, but I don't think the team is improved. I'd predict the same record as last season 66-96.

  15. #34
    I like your optimism. Nothing wrong with optimism now and then.

  16. #35
    Senior Member All-Star PseudoSABR's Avatar
    Posts
    1,759
    Like
    136
    Liked 108 Times in 65 Posts
    Oh, everybody regresses to the mean, how thoughtful!

  17. #36
    Senior Member All-Star TheLeviathan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,072
    Like
    97
    Liked 341 Times in 194 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by PseudoSABR View Post
    Oh, everybody regresses to the mean, how thoughtful!
    To be fair, everybody kind of does. So while we make take issue with the stats of some individuals, the end results are probably not as far off as we'd like to think.

  18. This user likes TheLeviathan's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (01-27-2014)

  19. #37
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,146
    Like
    62
    Liked 74 Times in 50 Posts
    The silver lining is that all of the people who love prospect lists and the Rule 4 draft will have something to look forward to in 2015.

  20. This user likes Kwak's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    johnnydakota (01-27-2014)

  21. #38
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,121
    Like
    370
    Liked 329 Times in 218 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Beauchamp View Post
    While it's definitely not out of the realm of possibility to lose 90 games again, this prediction is just absurd. A one-armed version of Joe Mauer could probably OPS around .750. Bi-lateral "omg there are rumors he might die tomorrow" weakness Joe Mauer posted an OPS of .730.

    It's pretty hard to take anything he's saying seriously when there's something so completely insane mixed in with the other, more valid, points.
    Quote Originally Posted by notoriousgod71 View Post
    I would bet that Mauer is being projected for typical catcher regression, even though he won't be catching anymore.

    Aside from that, I don't think losing another 90 games is outlandish. I don't think we've improved very much at all.

    The offense remains putrid and lost its second best player. Ryan spent money this off-season which is good, but I don't think the team is improved. I'd predict the same record as last season 66-96.


    Compounding the abusrdity of the derived math in his scenario, is the fact that he supposedly is factoring in for Mauer playing First Base full-time, not Catcher. If you click one level deeper in his skewed schema, with Mauer playing Catcher, he projects Mauer batting at:

    Davenport @ Catcher: .286/.366/.429-------->.795 OPS BABIP: ~.324 AB: 483

    Davenport @ First Base: .277/.356/.409----->.765 OPS BABIP: ~.325 AB: 537


    The numbers for Mauer at Catcher are near the other low-ball projection I could find, from ZIPS, only ZIPS has these numbers with Mauer, but at Frist Base:

    ZIPS @ First Base: .292/.378/.414----->.792 OPS BABIP: .334 AB: ~510

    The other projections from Rotoworld are all computed with Mauer as a Catcher, and all suggest much better performance numbers, and the composite-derived-BABIP and OPS from the 3 projections are much more realistic: OPS @ .820 to go along with a very fair BABIP @ ~.342:


    System Position Team AB R HR RBI SB AVG OBP SLG OPS BB K Value
    Composite Catcher MIN 533 79 12 71 3 0.296 0.384 0.435 0.820 75 96 $19
    RotoChamp Catcher MIN 515 83 11 72 2 0.283 0.375 0.421 0.796 74 95 $11
    Steamer Catcher MIN 560 79 14 76 3 0.297 0.388 0.439 0.827 83 102 $22
    CAIRO Catcher MIN 467 66 9 58 3 0.309 0.389 0.442 0.830 62 82 $10


    Oliver is the most optimistic, again at Catcher:

    .300/.382/.449 with an OPS @ .832 and BABIP @ .347, AB: 523.
    Last edited by jokin; 01-27-2014 at 08:47 PM.

  22. These 2 users like jokin's post and want to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    PseudoSABR (01-27-2014)

  23. #39
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,121
    Like
    370
    Liked 329 Times in 218 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLeviathan View Post
    To be fair, everybody kind of does. So while we make take issue with the stats of some individuals, the end results are probably not as far off as we'd like to think.
    Based on the other studies I just posted, and for the Twins' fortune's sake, the Davenport model is the low-ball number, and that Mauer is nearer to the Oliver projection on the high side....sadly, even with that type of decent production from Mauer, this team is still projected to be in the bottom quintile in hitting in 2014.

  24. #40
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    460
    Like
    135
    Liked 53 Times in 40 Posts
    Blog Entries
    13
    Mauer's 2014.

    .331 15 HR 85 RBI .420 OBP .851 OPS 152g

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.