Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 50

Thread: .500 Over/Under

  1. #21
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Physics Guy's Avatar
    Posts
    610
    Like
    20
    Liked 43 Times in 32 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by nicksaviking View Post
    I haven't seen any stats on it, but 12 games at .500 seems like a lot for any team, no matter which side of the mark they fall on. After all, it's impossible for a team to be at .500 more than one game in a row.
    Over-under for games at .500 OR above.

  2. #22
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Physics Guy's Avatar
    Posts
    610
    Like
    20
    Liked 43 Times in 32 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Hosken Bombo Disco View Post
    Are we really carrying 13 pitchers? I guess I thought people were just joking and jesting the last few days... I thought we signed starting pitching so we wouldn't have to do that anymore? Carrying 13 pitchers when you desire to pinch run for your best hitters at the earliest opportunity is roster mismanagement at its finest so I'll take the under
    I think the reason may be that they didn't feel there was a good option at this time other than a pitcher. They did already call up Mastro and Herrmann. I'd have to think Parmelee might be next, but I'm not sure what he's done in AAA.

    - Edit - I guess I should have read the next post. SweetOne69 basically just said the same.

  3. #23
    Which will be larger: The # of games the Twins >= .500 or the # of home runs hit by Bautista over the next 3 games?

  4. #24
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Physics Guy's Avatar
    Posts
    610
    Like
    20
    Liked 43 Times in 32 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Starting second game today at 4.

  5. #25
    Senior Member Triple-A Thegrin's Avatar
    Posts
    377
    Like
    0
    Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    going against the Royals with 5 and guaranteed at least 6 for the 2nd game. My over bet is looking better (Unless I misread the above thread, I was the only one who took the over.)

  6. #26
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Physics Guy's Avatar
    Posts
    610
    Like
    20
    Liked 43 Times in 32 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    If they win the KC series they are guaranteed 10.

  7. #27

  8. #28
    Senior Member Triple-A Thegrin's Avatar
    Posts
    377
    Like
    0
    Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    Late comers should have the line moved to 14

  9. #29
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Physics Guy's Avatar
    Posts
    610
    Like
    20
    Liked 43 Times in 32 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Thegrin View Post
    Late comers should have the line moved to 14
    That's what I was thinking.

  10. #30
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    445
    Like
    1
    Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Thegrin View Post
    Late comers should have the line moved to 14
    Why, when this thread started the Twins' were @ 3 and they currently are @ 4. Is the one day enough to move the target up by 2?

  11. #31
    Senior Member Triple-A Thegrin's Avatar
    Posts
    377
    Like
    0
    Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    game 4 and 1 game above 500. That guarantees that they will finish another game above 500. Which is what happened. Now, with the loss of the 1st game to KC, the Twins are 5 games of 500 or better, but a loss tomorrow could bring them below 500 again. I still like the over bet.

  12. #32
    Senior Member Triple-A Thegrin's Avatar
    Posts
    377
    Like
    0
    Liked 14 Times in 10 Posts
    Blog Entries
    11
    The Twins start against the Rays today at 9-9. This makes it 6 days at 500 or better.

  13. #33
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Physics Guy's Avatar
    Posts
    610
    Like
    20
    Liked 43 Times in 32 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Thegrin View Post
    The Twins start against the Rays today at 9-9. This makes it 6 days at 500 or better.
    I counted game 1 (0-0) so the Twins are at 7 and counting.

  14. #34
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Physics Guy's Avatar
    Posts
    610
    Like
    20
    Liked 43 Times in 32 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    The next three series will determine if they have a shot. TB, Det and LAD could bury them well below .500. I have the feeling this crew has a little more grit and may hang around .500 a little longer.

  15. #35
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    445
    Like
    1
    Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Physics Guy View Post
    I counted game 1 (0-0) so the Twins are at 7 and counting.
    The OP criteria was "starting the day" at or above .500, not number of games at or above .500 so the correct tally is 6.

    Day 1: Opening Day (0-0)
    Day 2: Home Opener (3-3)
    Day 3: Toronto Game 1 (6-6)
    Day 4: KC Game 1 (8-7)
    Day 5: KC Game 2 (8-8)
    Day 6: TB Game 1 (9-9)

  16. #36
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    160
    Like
    1
    Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
    This thread titile is confusing. I thought it was a gambling discussion on Aaron Hicks OPS for a second ;-)

  17. These 2 users like jharaldson's post and want to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    mike wants wins (04-23-2014), snepp (04-23-2014)

  18. #37
    Junior Member Rookie
    Posts
    13
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I'm late to the thread but can you really count opening day as being at .500? Sure, you've won the same number of games as you've lost but your winning percentage isn't .500 either.

  19. #38
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Physics Guy's Avatar
    Posts
    610
    Like
    20
    Liked 43 Times in 32 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by SweetOne69 View Post
    The OP criteria was "starting the day" at or above .500, not number of games at or above .500 so the correct tally is 6.

    Day 1: Opening Day (0-0)
    Day 2: Home Opener (3-3)
    Day 3: Toronto Game 1 (6-6)
    Day 4: KC Game 1 (8-7)
    Day 5: KC Game 2 (8-8)
    Day 6: TB Game 1 (9-9)
    No, the OP (who was me) criteria was:

    Quote Originally Posted by Physics Guy View Post
    So my question is, how many games do the Twins go into this year with a .500 record or better to start the day.
    I meant to leave off the last part "to start the day". Sorry for the confusion. Like I tell my wife, "Listen to what I mean, not what I actually say."

    They entered the following games with a .500 record or better:

    Game 1 0-0
    Game 7 3-3
    Game 13 6-6
    Game 15 7-7
    Game 16 8-7
    Game 17 8-8
    Game 19 9-9

  20. #39
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Physics Guy's Avatar
    Posts
    610
    Like
    20
    Liked 43 Times in 32 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    The original statement would have been fine, except for the doubleheader against Toronto.

  21. #40
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    334
    Like
    26
    Liked 51 Times in 35 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    I think a more interesting question is the last day of the season the Twins are not below .500.

    For example, if the Twins lose today, but hang around 2-5 below .500 all season until the last week and win their last five to finish 81-81, the total will be 6. Or 7. Whatever. But if they lose today and their next 30 ball games, and finish 59-103, the total will also be 6. Or 7.

    But staying afloat until April 22 or Sept 30--big difference!

  22. This user likes AM.'s post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    mike wants wins (04-23-2014)

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.