10-08-2012, 08:12 AM #1
Has been mentioned that the Marlins will most likely trade him this off-season and the Twins would be interested. He is owed 13.75 million this year and is a free agent after the season (would be a Type A most likely)
I think he is worth trying to get assuming we don't have to give up one of Hicks, Sano, Arcia, Gibson or Rosario. Wonder if they would be interested in Ben Revere+prospects
Johnson in the rotation instantly gives the team an ace, and if they could sign another decent FA or even Scott Baker you could be looking at a rotation of:
Johnson, Baker, Diamond, Gibson, Hendriks.
Not to shabby.
10-08-2012, 08:41 AM #2
I'd push hard for a Shields for Span swap before going after Johnson. Given the current state of the Twins, I'm not crazy about the idea of giving up a prospect for one year of a starter.
10-08-2012, 09:22 AM #3
Trade for him and offer him a 4 year 70 million dollar extension?
It would be a good time to "buy" on Johnson as his value isn't as high as it was pre injury, but the guy has legit ace stuff. I'd rather give up a couple prospects or players and give him 70 million rather then compete in free agency for an "ace" like Grienke or whatnot.
10-08-2012, 09:25 AM #4
If he's open to an extension, I'd be far more open to the acquisition. I completely forgot that he's a Minnesota native.
10-08-2012, 09:57 AM #5
I like the idea if he's open to an extension. Even though 2012 was a down year for him, his numbers were still pretty good. It's probably as close to buying low as you can get for a guy like him.
I didn't have time to type out all his numbers, but everyone here should know how to get to baseball reference anyway.You can come up with statistics to prove anything. Forty percent of all people know that.
10-08-2012, 09:58 AM #6
10-08-2012, 09:59 AM #7
Can't really think he'd be cheap probably at least 2 of our top 10 prospects or more. Giving up multiple top prospects with the chance he walks after the season is not a typical TR type deal.
I think he moved away when he was very young but he could give us a discount like Mauer did!
I still think a deal centered around Span and Shields makes the most sense. Fills a need for them he is from Tampa and it saves them a bunch of money.This comment brought to you from the Rosedale Mall studio by Hamm's Beer, brewed in the land of sky blue waters.
10-08-2012, 10:06 AM #8
10-08-2012, 10:22 AM #9
- Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
- Blog Entries
10-08-2012, 10:32 AM #10
So, he's Scott Baker, except significantly better than Scott Baker?
Do you think other teams would be willing to give up more than Span to get Shields? Because if they would, there's no reason for the Rays to trade Shields for Span and maybe a throw-in.
Shields has an option on his contract for $12 million in 2014, and it's not out of the realm of possibility that whichever team has him at that point would gladly pick that option up. Span likely won't ever earn more than $10 million in a season. Point is, starting pitching is more valuable on the market than outfielders.
10-08-2012, 10:52 AM #11
- Liked 568 Times in 372 Posts
I would roll the die on Johnson. Given his health and salary, it should take Revere or something like that to get him, something I would do with Hicks and Arcia available.
10-08-2012, 10:54 AM #12
Like I said, the Rays would get three years of Span for the same money as two years of Shields. both have an option for their last season. Is Shields so much more valuable than Span that he's worth significantly more than that three-for-two-years swap? I don't think so and the numbers agree with me.
10-08-2012, 10:55 AM #13
- Liked 66 Times in 43 Posts
The goal this offseason has to be to improve the starting rotation. If we can add a Shields or Josh Johnson type pitcher without selling absoluting everything, then we have to do it. If we have to give up Span to get him then so be it. I honestly think Hicks might be ready to take over in CF by mid season next year. Revere could handle things in CF until then.
If we could get Shields or Johnson and then add someone like Edwin Jackson, we would be looking pretty decent SP-wise. I'm guessing Morneau could be traded this offseason if the Twins want to free up some payroll for SP.
10-08-2012, 10:55 AM #14
No reason to compare him to Baker. Baker is coming off TJ surgery, no way to tell if he will be any good after that, some are some aren't. He likely won't be back (starting) until May or June and he isn't under contract unless you pick up the option.
Baker is a non factor until he proves he can pitch again and he is signed.
Shields would likely be a top 5 starter in the Central. Besides Verlander and Sales who is better?This comment brought to you from the Rosedale Mall studio by Hamm's Beer, brewed in the land of sky blue waters.
10-08-2012, 10:57 AM #15
Off the top of my head, I'd take Scherzer before Shields, no question.
10-08-2012, 11:10 AM #16
- Liked 54 Times in 35 Posts
Considering Tampa's dreadful offense, if they were not going to trade pitching to make a playoff run they were so close to last season, why would they now? What they value Shields as would be a high value that Brock would disagree with. More than likely what the Rays want, the Twins did not have then. It would be more like Arcia and Benson with a good pitching prospect then a Span. Look at their trading history.
A decent prospect with a few low A guys could get you a Johnson. I do not know if the Twins would do that kind of trade.
10-08-2012, 11:26 AM #17
10-08-2012, 11:27 AM #18
10-08-2012, 11:29 AM #19
10-08-2012, 11:32 AM #20