Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: So...uh....does this team actually have a uh....chance?

  1. #1
    Senior Member All-Star SpiritofVodkaDave's Avatar
    Posts
    3,949
    Like
    85
    Liked 375 Times in 193 Posts

    So...uh....does this team actually have a uh....chance?

    Beat Green Bay at home today and outplayed em, we outplayed em in Green Bay as well bust lost to a couple stupid turnovers.

    As the playoffs shape up now we play:

    @ Green Bay
    then
    @ Atlanta

    Am I crazy to think we actually have a shot to win both of those games?

  2. #2
    Twins News Team All-Star TheLeviathan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,804
    Like
    173
    Liked 652 Times in 366 Posts
    I actually think we have a better chance to beat Atlanta. But I've been down on this team all year, maybe I'll just stay pessimistic.

  3. #3
    Senior Member All-Star SpiritofVodkaDave's Avatar
    Posts
    3,949
    Like
    85
    Liked 375 Times in 193 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLeviathan View Post
    I actually think we have a better chance to beat Atlanta. But I've been down on this team all year, maybe I'll just stay pessimistic.
    Heh, yeah.

    As much as we can talk **** on Ponder (for which there is many) the kid came up HUGGGGE in about 4 of 5 3rd and longs, and the one long pass he threw was right on the money. If we stay healthy and play like we did today...dare I say we can hang with anyone?

  4. #4
    Twins News Team All-Star TheLeviathan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,804
    Like
    173
    Liked 652 Times in 366 Posts
    Ponder certainly made some huge throws today, have to tip my hat to his performance. He helped us win today, which is what we need him to do.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Triple-A kydoty's Avatar
    Posts
    270
    Like
    2
    Liked 89 Times in 35 Posts
    Ponder the last couples of weeks likely cemented his status as the starting quarterback for 2013.

    "Mediocre breaking balls are a gift from God." - Kirby Puckett

  6. #6
    Senior Member All-Star Badsmerf's Avatar
    Posts
    1,585
    Like
    18
    Liked 75 Times in 42 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by kydoty View Post
    Ponder the last couples of weeks likely cemented his status as the starting quarterback for 2013.
    Regretfully. I was surprised he could throw the ball as far as he did, where the **** has that been all year? He still made some terrible throws and I believe the Vikings would do well to draft a project QB in the middle rounds or trade Percy for one.

    This team might have shot. It is all going to depend on how well the defense can play. AP will put up 150 yards again because this defense can't hold him and Blair Walsh is money so they will put points on the board. Can't let them get big plays. Hopefully Winnfield plays next weekend, his absence was felt in the running game and passing game.
    Do or do not. There is no try.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Kirby_Waved_At_Me's Avatar
    Posts
    557
    Like
    58
    Liked 163 Times in 84 Posts
    they also missed Winfield's presence on special teams because Marcus Sherels was playing in the secondary and not returning / covering kicks. That meant a few players playing less comfortable positions (like Aromashodu on Special teams).
    Does anyone happen to know if the Vikings will try to add another player for depth in the secondary? Could they if they want to?
    I'm not sure they would place Winfield on IR at this point, he may be willing to give it another shot.

  8. #8
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,711
    Like
    1,159
    Liked 563 Times in 368 Posts
    The last two super bowl champions were 6 seeds, at least I hears that yesterday...if you make the playoffs, you have a chance.

  9. #9
    Senior Member All-Star Badsmerf's Avatar
    Posts
    1,585
    Like
    18
    Liked 75 Times in 42 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    The team I fear the most is Seattle. If the Vike GB and win there, they can win at SF or ATL (I saw they would play SF, not ATL... doesn't matter). They are winning games unlike any team in this era. They have an explosive running game and a passing attack that is starting to find some footing and a defense that can shut you down. I don't think they will win at GB, but it is fun to speculate. At least we can feel like they have a chance... I thought for sure they were destined for a last place finish in the NFC North after they started sliding. The Packers have to some doubts about this game, they got lucky the first time and played behind the whole second game.
    Do or do not. There is no try.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer biggentleben's Avatar
    Posts
    935
    Like
    40
    Liked 68 Times in 48 Posts
    freshinthehouse said they're not sniffing the playoffs. What is all this playoff talk about?!
    Staff Writer for Tomahawktake.com, come check it out!

  11. #11
    Senior Member All-Star Willihammer's Avatar
    Posts
    2,771
    Like
    660
    Liked 383 Times in 213 Posts
    Blog Entries
    10
    They could win in Atlanta and in NO if they are playing their best. I'm not so optimistic about their chances at Lambeau, or SF or SEA, they haven't been able to win on the road, on grass, since 2009. You need a QB for that.

  12. #12
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    236
    Like
    3
    Liked 24 Times in 12 Posts
    They have a great chance to make it to Super Bowl as a 14 point underdog, but one pick 6 and it's over.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    301
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Badsmerf View Post
    Regretfully. I was surprised he could throw the ball as far as he did
    Why? He wouldn't have been drafted in the first round if he couldn't throw the ball 50 yards in the air.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    590
    Like
    1
    Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    If we can get that first win, then a deep run is possile. But that first win will be tough. Really hard to win in Lambeau, really hard to beat the same team 2 weeks in a row.

    The way Rodgers was carving up our secondary after Winfield went down did not leave me with a lot of happy feelings about Saturday night.

    I think we need a monster day from AP and an effective, mistake-free day from Ponder, grind out some long, drives that end in 7, not 3, and keep Rodgers on the sideline.

    We'll see. In any case, it's fun to have one of the local boys teams in the postseason again, it's only been a couple of years, but it sure feels like forever.

  15. #15
    Senior Member All-Star SpiritofVodkaDave's Avatar
    Posts
    3,949
    Like
    85
    Liked 375 Times in 193 Posts
    Yeah Winfield needs to play, but if that isn't the case as least they will be able to defensively scheme with the knowledge that he won't be in the game. Rather then just running out Sherrils cold.

  16. #16
    If they can get past Green Bay in Green Bay, sure. Winfield needs to play though.

    The Vikings are 9 point underdogs currently.

  17. #17
    Senior Member All-Star Badsmerf's Avatar
    Posts
    1,585
    Like
    18
    Liked 75 Times in 42 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Kobs View Post
    Why? He wouldn't have been drafted in the first round if he couldn't throw the ball 50 yards in the air.
    Because he's proven to lack the arm strength of what most would consider an NFL QB. Maybe its a confidence thing, but I just don't see him ever being able to overcome it.
    Do or do not. There is no try.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer gil4's Avatar
    Posts
    579
    Like
    146
    Liked 144 Times in 80 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLeviathan View Post
    Ponder certainly made some huge throws today, have to tip my hat to his performance. He helped us win today, which is what we need him to do.
    Ponder was better, but more lucky than good. A lot of passes that need some touch he just floats too much, including all three of the TD passes he threw. The one to Peterson was horrible - he ran the bootleg and looked up about 2 steps too late and then lobbed it out there. I was afraid Peterson was going to go out of bounds because it took so long to get him the ball. The stat line looked better, but he didn't play as well as it indicated.

    On long passes he's not accurate enough and on short passes he doesn't put the right pace on the ball. He could still improve, but I'm not sure he can be a QB that can win consistently.

  19. #19
    Senior Member All-Star Willihammer's Avatar
    Posts
    2,771
    Like
    660
    Liked 383 Times in 213 Posts
    Blog Entries
    10
    Yeah don't forget that 20 yard floating jump ball that Wright somehow caught, in a sea of Packers. Or the falling down non-intentional grounding which on review was a sack (knee down) that never got credited to the Packers. Its plays like those that make the Vikings, and Ponder's successes look like smoke and mirrors. Then there are the third and 4 shotgun plays which I've been bitching about all year long. Why this team would ever take AP out of that situation still baffles me. They are averaging better yardage on running attempts than passing attempts.

    I think two things will need to happen for the Vikings to have a prayer: no turnovers, and the D-line will have to hit Rodgers more, or he will carve up that secondary all day. They had a lot of near-sacks that Rodgers managed to slip out of last week and turn into 20 yard gains.
    Last edited by Willihammer; 01-02-2013 at 12:41 PM.

  20. #20
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,711
    Like
    1,159
    Liked 563 Times in 368 Posts
    Does not matter what Ponder does, people will rip him. The team won 7 more games than last year, the QB deserves some credit, lucky or not.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.