Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 90

Thread: Opening Day lineup?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    603
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Opening Day lineup?

    I haven't been around in awhile, so I apologize if I'm duplicating a recent thread, but with ST close, I wanna start talking opening day.

    In the hopes that the Twins give Podsednik a small deal to keep the OF from becoming too bad, here's my ideal lineup:

    1: Podsednik - CF
    2: Mauer - C
    3: Willingham - LF
    4: Mourneau - 1B
    5: Doumit - DH
    6: Plouffe - 3B
    7: Parmelee - RF
    8: Dozier - 2B
    9: Escobar - SS

    Bench - Mastroianni, Carroll, Butera, and whoever actually hits decent in ST.

    Send Florimon to Rochester, but tell him to keep his bags packed.

    Not going to go into pitching, because I can barely keep straight who all these guys are with minor league deals/ST invites.

    If they stay don't sign Podsednik, at least for opening day I'd put Mastroianni in the leadoff spot and starting CF, and give backup OF to whomever plays better between Hicks and Benson

  2. #2
    The King In The North All-Star Nick Nelson's Avatar
    Posts
    1,683
    Twitter
    @nnelson9
    Like
    6
    Liked 87 Times in 31 Posts
    Blog Entries
    323
    1. Hicks CF
    2. Mauer C
    3. Willingham LF
    4. Morneau 1B
    5. Doumit DH
    6. Plouffe 3B
    7. Parmelee RF
    8. Dozier 2B
    9. Florimon SS

    SP: Diamond

  3. #3
    Twins News Team All-Star PseudoSABR's Avatar
    Posts
    1,954
    Like
    257
    Liked 205 Times in 115 Posts
    I agree with Nick's but I think we'll see either Mastroianni or Benson in CF to open the season.

  4. #4
    1. Bourn CF
    2. Mauer C
    3. Willingham LF
    4. Morneau 1B
    5. Doumit DH
    6. Plouffe 3B
    7. Parmelee RF
    8. Dozier 2B
    9. Florimon SS

    SP: Lohse

  5. #5
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    603
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    So what's the argument for Florimon over Escobar?

    Escobar has actually played more games in the majors, and spent a full season in AAA (which Florimon has not done), so I'd think he's a little more mentally prepared to play a full season in the bigs. Had he not been traded, he probably would have spent the entire year on the 25 man roster for the Sox. Florimon may have not even made it to the bigs if any one of Valencia/Burroughs/Hughes/Dozier had stayed healthy and played like a starter all year.

    Neither guy is a candidate to be an offensive force, but Escobar seems to have a significantly lower strikeout rate (at the expense of power). In terms of offense, I'd rather have a guy in the 9 hole that gets a lot of singles than a guy who gets the occasional extra base hit but strikes out a ton. Defensively, I haven't seen either play enough to really tell if there is much difference.

  6. #6
    Speediest Moderator All-Star snepp's Avatar
    Posts
    4,094
    Like
    1,826
    Liked 1,299 Times in 525 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by spideyo View Post
    So what's the argument for Florimon over Escobar?
    The same as the argument for Keystone Light over Busch Light.
    "Maybe you could go grab a bat and ball… and learn something. Maybe you will get it."
    - Strib commenter educating the elitists on the value of RBI's

  7. #7
    Head Moderator MVP glunn's Avatar
    Posts
    5,084
    Like
    4,551
    Liked 726 Times in 386 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by ppearson50 View Post
    1. Bourn CF
    2. Mauer C
    3. Willingham LF
    4. Morneau 1B
    5. Doumit DH
    6. Plouffe 3B
    7. Parmelee RF
    8. Dozier 2B
    9. Florimon SS

    SP: Lohse
    I like the idea of Bourn, but only if the price is right and the plan is to trade him around midseason for prospects. I would hate to see him block Hicks and Benson for the entire season.

  8. #8
    Speediest Moderator All-Star snepp's Avatar
    Posts
    4,094
    Like
    1,826
    Liked 1,299 Times in 525 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by glunn View Post
    I like the idea of Bourn, but only if the price is right and the plan is to trade him around midseason for prospects. I would hate to see him block Hicks and Benson for the entire season.
    He would also require compensation to sign.
    "Maybe you could go grab a bat and ball… and learn something. Maybe you will get it."
    - Strib commenter educating the elitists on the value of RBI's

  9. #9
    Twins News Team MVP
    Posts
    6,787
    Like
    896
    Liked 868 Times in 557 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by snepp View Post
    He would also require compensation to sign.
    But only a loss of a 2nd rounder? And an opportunity to regain the lost pick with a qualifying offer the year after, right?

  10. #10
    Speediest Moderator All-Star snepp's Avatar
    Posts
    4,094
    Like
    1,826
    Liked 1,299 Times in 525 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jokin View Post
    But only a loss of a 2nd rounder? And an opportunity to regain the lost pick with a qualifying offer the year after, right?
    True, if you keep him the entire year.

    Or maybe someone gets desperate at the deadline and you trade him for better value than the pick lost (the front office doesn't exactly have a great track record of deadline deals though).
    "Maybe you could go grab a bat and ball… and learn something. Maybe you will get it."
    - Strib commenter educating the elitists on the value of RBI's

  11. #11
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    576
    Like
    0
    Liked 15 Times in 10 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by snepp View Post
    The same as the argument for Keystone Light over Busch Light.
    Packs very little punch and is very underwhelming when compared to better alternatives if only you shelled out a couple extra bucks???

  12. #12
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,251
    Like
    108
    Liked 105 Times in 77 Posts
    This thread smacks of Deux es Machina. You include players who aren't even on the team and inset him as the regular CF! Your logic of using this "cheap, place-holder type" CF as a regular, but ignore the already on-hand Carroll in favor of the "failed-once" Dozier is mystifying. There is no evidence provided to support a preference of Podsednik over any of the three CF candidates on hand.

  13. #13
    Speediest Moderator All-Star snepp's Avatar
    Posts
    4,094
    Like
    1,826
    Liked 1,299 Times in 525 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by edavis0308 View Post
    Packs very little punch and is very underwhelming when compared to better alternatives if only you shelled out a couple extra bucks???
    I was going to say, "they both suck," but your way works too.
    "Maybe you could go grab a bat and ball… and learn something. Maybe you will get it."
    - Strib commenter educating the elitists on the value of RBI's

  14. #14
    Banned All-Star
    Posts
    1,498
    Like
    419
    Liked 75 Times in 49 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by snepp View Post
    True, if you keep him the entire year.

    Or maybe someone gets desperate at the deadline and you trade him for better value than the pick lost (the front office doesn't exactly have a great track record of deadline deals though).
    That would require thinking out of the box , which the current front office is unable to do

  15. #15
    Senior Member Triple-A raindog's Avatar
    Posts
    299
    Like
    45
    Liked 21 Times in 16 Posts
    1. Mastroianni CF
    2. Carroll 2B
    3. Mauer C
    4. Willingham LF
    5. Morneau 1B
    6. Doumit DH
    7. Plouffe 3B
    8. Parmelee RF
    9. Florimon SS

    This is what I expect it to be. I'd bat Mauer 2nd, but I don't expect Gardy to do that.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    603
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by jokin View Post
    But only a loss of a 2nd rounder? And an opportunity to regain the lost pick with a qualifying offer the year after, right?
    Only if you keep him all year. That's why I'd be more in favor of Posednik, he'd be more willing to sign on to be a "placeholder". Bourn isn't going to want to do that

  17. #17
    Twins Moderator MVP Riverbrian's Avatar
    Posts
    8,781
    Like
    4,922
    Liked 2,304 Times in 1,295 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by spideyo View Post
    So what's the argument for Florimon over Escobar?
    .
    I really don't know... I can only guess... Florimon has been thought of as the opening day starter from what I've been reading. He has never been a hitter... That tells me that the Twins think that Florimon is a defensive wizard because they would go with a better hitter.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    603
    Like
    0
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Kwak View Post
    This thread smacks of Deux es Machina. You include players who aren't even on the team and inset him as the regular CF! Your logic of using this "cheap, place-holder type" CF as a regular, but ignore the already on-hand Carroll in favor of the "failed-once" Dozier is mystifying. There is no evidence provided to support a preference of Podsednik over any of the three CF candidates on hand.
    This is an opening day lineup only. I did say if they don't sign Posednik (who is on the market, and the twins have expressed interest in), that I'd put Mastroianni in his spot at #1. Mastroianni is the only CF option right now that has seen any big league action, and I'd rather him be a 4th OF that can come in and pinch run in late innings.

    I think Dozier is worth a look at 2B, but with a very short leash. Carroll would be the obvious second in line there, but he's going to be 39 at the start of the season, and I'd rather not have to rely on him every day. He's also most valuable to us because he can backup 2b, 3b and SS reliably, if one of the kids is having a bad day.

  19. #19
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    4,179
    Twitter
    @thrylos98
    Like
    36
    Liked 446 Times in 273 Posts
    Blog Entries
    200
    Quote Originally Posted by raindog View Post
    1. Mastroianni CF
    2. Carroll 2B
    3. Mauer C
    4. Willingham LF
    5. Morneau 1B
    6. Doumit DH
    7. Plouffe 3B
    8. Parmelee RF
    9. Florimon SS

    This is what I expect it to be. I'd bat Mauer 2nd, but I don't expect Gardy to do that.
    That seems just about right for Gardy and with Diamond pitching if healthy.

    Ideal for me :

    1. Hicks CF
    2. Benson LF
    3. Mauer C
    4. Plouffe 3B
    5. Parmelee 1B
    6. Doumit DH
    7. Arcia RF
    8. Dozier 2B
    9. Florimon SS

    Harden SP.

    This assumes Morneau and Willingham are traded for prospects. Hopefully one of them is a middle infielder who would start in place of either Florimon or Dozier.

    But it will happen when pigs fly.
    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  20. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by Kwak View Post
    You include players who aren't even on the team and inset him as the regular CF! Your logic of using this "cheap, place-holder type" CF as a regular, but ignore the already on-hand Carroll in favor of the "failed-once" Dozier is mystifying. There is no evidence provided to support a preference of Podsednik over any of the three CF candidates on hand.
    Cracks me up Kwak, I was thinking the same thing when I read this post earlier today. How can you assert that. Twins wouldn't bring anyone in to play CF until last week or two of Spring Training, seeing as the other options would all have to look overmatched and overwhelmed. Mastroianni hasn't shown that in his body of work yet. Benson has. Hicks, we're sure to find out.

    Florimon isn't going anywhere unless someone else is brought in a la Diaz. Dozier, I guess, could be magically better, since he claims to have figured his stuff out, but I see him as making the club as a 2B. I see Carroll supplanting all three of them, much like Punto did back in the day. Escobar only makes the club if the Twins Dozier bombs in spring training.

    I don't think Butera makes the big club even with the arbitration earning of 750k. At the outset of the season, there should be two catchers... Mr. 120 games this season and Doughboy. But what am I saying, who else are they going to have to weigh the bench down?

    4th OF - Mastroianni (Hicks should earn the spot).
    Backup INF - Carroll (Situational as Plouffe, Florimon and Dozier will be on rotation)
    3rd guy?! - Maybe it is between Butera and Escobar. This should be a basher, masher, crasher type. Don't think that'll happen either.

    The Twins keep 12 pitchers for sure, but this year, with Pressley and Harden, along with a few others... I actually think it will be 13. Especially given the Twins don't want to start out 5 or more games behind in the first few weeks.

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.