Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 31 of 31

Thread: Wolfson: Starting pitching on the Twins' radar

  1. #21
    Senior Member All-Star Shane Wahl's Avatar
    Posts
    3,993
    Like
    4
    Liked 124 Times in 90 Posts
    Blog Entries
    67
    Career ERA+ for Nolasco is 94, for Vargas it's 91.

  2. #22
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    746
    Like
    28
    Liked 60 Times in 48 Posts
    Blog Entries
    9
    Ubaldo is the only one likely to cost 15 million or so per season. Nolasco and maybe Ubaldo are the only ones worth 4 years on a contract. If the Twins sign one of these and another one like Vargas or Hughes at 8-10 million on a short term contract 1-3 seasons then They won't break the bank to sign these guys. I would be surprised if they get Nolasco or Ubaldo.

    So we could have a rotation of:
    Nolasco
    Vargas
    Deduno
    Correia
    Gibson/Pelfry
    with a bunch of capable 6th and 7th starters Albers/ Diamond/ Worely/ Hendriks/ Meyer and more...

  3. #23
    Senior Member All-Star Shane Wahl's Avatar
    Posts
    3,993
    Like
    4
    Liked 124 Times in 90 Posts
    Blog Entries
    67
    Nolasco is going to get at least 3 years. And it's going to be a disaster for whoever signs him.

  4. #24
    Senior Member All-Star Willihammer's Avatar
    Posts
    2,782
    Like
    665
    Liked 384 Times in 214 Posts
    Blog Entries
    10
    Roberto Hernandez is worth a call IMO. Coming off a career low BB rate and career high K%. Over a run difference in xFIP to ERA, good candidate for regression.

  5. #25
    Senior Member Triple-A goulik's Avatar
    Posts
    297
    Like
    44
    Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    In our complaints, let's not forget that Correia, While average at best was our best pitcher and costs less than Blackburn. If we sign some big names, Correia does fit nicely as a #3. He started slow but his final numbers were better than we expected and his contract is quite reasonable for what it brings...

    Any of these would improve the rotation so I am in as long as it makes long term and short term sense numbers wise

  6. #26
    Twins Contributor All-Star Jeremy Nygaard's Avatar
    Posts
    1,920
    Twitter
    @jeremynygaard
    Like
    1
    Liked 119 Times in 65 Posts
    Blog Entries
    178
    Quote Originally Posted by diehardtwinsfan View Post
    If Santana performs, sacrificing a second rounder is a no brainer, even in a deep draft, but given his history, is Santana worth that price?
    The "depth" of the 2014 draft is being over-stated. Last year the top tier was 3-4 guys, followed by 8-9 guys, followed by about 30 other guys that could be first rounders.

    Obviously it's early, but right now that top tier is looking deeper (maybe 7-8 guys) followed by a dozen or so guys, followed by very few guys that are getting first round grades.

    If there is an offseason preceding a draft where I would advocate burning a 2nd round pick to sign a FA - based solely on early reports - it would be this one.

  7. #27
    Senior Member Double-A Wookiee of the Year's Avatar
    Posts
    133
    Like
    9
    Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by goulik View Post
    If we sign some big names, Correia does fit nicely as a #3. He started slow but his final numbers were better than we expected and his contract is quite reasonable for what it brings...
    Honestly, that's not how I remember it at all. I remember Correia getting off to a strong start, but then his numbers bounced back to typical for his career. (A quick search gives me this from Aaron Gleeman on 8/8: "Kevin Correia has a 5.90 ERA and .329 opponents' batting average in 17 starts since May 1.") Not that he can't function as a back-of-the-rotation arm--you're right, he can hold down that fort for another year.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeremy Nygaard View Post
    The "depth" of the 2014 draft is being over-stated. Last year the top tier was 3-4 guys, followed by 8-9 guys, followed by about 30 other guys that could be first rounders.

    Obviously it's early, but right now that top tier is looking deeper (maybe 7-8 guys) followed by a dozen or so guys, followed by very few guys that are getting first round grades.

    If there is an offseason preceding a draft where I would advocate burning a 2nd round pick to sign a FA - based solely on early reports - it would be this one.
    Thanks for this assessment. Honestly, I love this kind of analysis--the sort of "is this the year to..." questions. (I find myself wondering what next year's FA Starting Pitching market looks like--how easy will it be to continue building then? What does that say about how aggressive the Twins should be this year?)

  8. #28
    Senior Member Triple-A goulik's Avatar
    Posts
    297
    Like
    44
    Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    I had to look Correias numbers but When I said started slowly I was simply remembering he finished strong the last couple months. Correia ERA by month. (ESPN.go.com MLB splits)
    April 2.23
    May 6.26
    June 4.29
    July 6.18
    August 3.60
    September 3.48

  9. #29
    Senior Member Double-A Wookiee of the Year's Avatar
    Posts
    133
    Like
    9
    Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by goulik View Post
    I had to look Correias numbers but When I said started slowly I was simply remembering he finished strong the last couple months. Correia ERA by month. (ESPN.go.com MLB splits)
    April 2.23
    May 6.26
    June 4.29
    July 6.18
    August 3.60
    September 3.48
    Ah--thanks for providing the breakdown. I hadn't realized Correia turned it around so much in August and September. It's funny how much sequencing has to do with how good a year we think someone had. In 2012, Willingham got off to a hot start, then had a good but not great year. Jamey Carroll started very cold but actually played quite well in August and September. While people remember 2012 as a great year for Willingham, few think of Carroll as providing much value that same year.

  10. #30
    It is fun to speculate, but seriously? The Twins will throw out enough rumors to stoke the hot stove fire but at the end of the day, they are planning and have planned all along to stand at the end of the line and pick from the remaining junk that no one else wanted.

  11. #31
    Twins Moderator All-Star diehardtwinsfan's Avatar
    Posts
    4,381
    Like
    415
    Liked 813 Times in 513 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Brock Beauchamp View Post
    You know how you feel about Nolasco?

    I feel that way about Santana. Times two.

    I think he's going to be a dreadful signing. Too old, too inconsistent, coming off a very good year. He's going to be a bad value.

    I'd rather give four years to Hughes than four years to Santana.
    The only difference between Santana and Nolasco in my opinion is the price and I think Santana has more upside to go with the risk. I don't necessarily disagree with you, which is why I posted my question. Santana is going to get 4-5 years at 15-18ish per year from someone, and that someone will give up a second rounder or a late first round pick. I think the word here is trepidation. I'd rather go after Tanaka or Hughes.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.