Minnesota Twins News & Rumors Forum
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 128

Thread: Article: Twins To Sign Phil Hughes

  1. #81
    Senior Member All-Star Shane Wahl's Avatar
    Posts
    3,993
    Like
    4
    Liked 124 Times in 90 Posts
    Blog Entries
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by pierre75275 View Post
    I like this much more then the Nolasco signing.I think Hughes has much more talent to outplay his contract then Nolasco does.
    This is pretty indisputably true.

  2. #82
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    153
    Like
    0
    Liked 7 Times in 4 Posts
    I'm very pleased with this signing. A 3-year deal on a pitcher who still has upside and is only 27? That's a relatively low-risk for a market-rate contract. I would agree that if he's got an OF of Willingham, Presley, and Arcia behind him it's not going to go too well, but I think it's much more likely that Willingham is DHing and Hicks gets another shot at CF. And beyond that, we've got Hughes for 3 seasons...think what our OF may look like in years 2 & 3!

    The K rate is a nice improvement and if Anderson can get a few things ironed out, pitching in MN could go well for Hughes. I think this deal will work out for the team.

    So next season we're looking at Nolasco, Correia, Hughes, and Gibson (there's no way they give up on him this quickly) with Deduno/Diamond/Worley to fill out the back. No need to rush Meyer & May, but openings will be available in 2015 as contracts run out and better pitchers demand spaces.

    The Nolasco & Hughes signings aren't transformative in the traditional sense, but they don't have to be. They will hopefully stabilize an awful rotation and bridge eras until guys like Meyer, May, Stewart, & Berrios are ready to join the rotation. Going from awful to quality will go a long way towards making this team respectable again.

  3. #83
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    498
    Like
    2
    Liked 80 Times in 50 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Shane Wahl View Post
    So would Keith Law have also concluded that a two year deal for $24 million would have been excessive?
    Clearly he would, and even more so than 3/24. The low AAV basically leverages the Twins' belief/hope he will pitch better away from New York; if that turns out to be true, they get 3 years on the cheap. Paying a higher AAV for fewer years would take away the upside without reducing the risk.

    I like the move because, while 2014 is a lost cause, it gives the Twins a potential asset for subsequent years when it might make a difference. They still should add another starter one way or another.

  4. #84
    Senior Member All-Star SpiritofVodkaDave's Avatar
    Posts
    3,987
    Like
    103
    Liked 385 Times in 200 Posts
    If things break right, 2014 may not be a lost cause...

  5. #85
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    978
    Like
    3
    Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by markos View Post
    The conventional wisdom that Hughes has struggled because of Yankee Stadium's short right porch is not correct. For his career (both at home and on the road), Hughes has given up home runs at a higher rate to right-handed hitters than to lefties (overall, 4.6% to RH, 4.1% to LH). His career opponent SLG has similar reverse splits (.438 for RH, .431 for LH).

    I don't think that moving to Target Field will be the panacea for Hughes that people are expecting. Yes, it should provide some improvement; however, it doesn't suppress RH pull power very much, and RH batters have always hit Hughes well. Additionally, pitching in front of a Willingham, Presley, Arcia outfield could be very, very ugly. I think expecting a sub-4.00 ERA is very optimistic.
    I don't disagree about the OF defense, but giving up HR to RH/LH batters does not tell you where those HR went. Of his 24 HR last season, just six landed in the left field seats. Every other HR was from CF to RF.

    Now sadly, if you overlay Target Field, supposedly that only takes away one HR. Not sure how accurate that overlay is and it can't take into account the colder weather or other conditions --if there are any -- in Target Field (air currents) that may be more likely keeping balls in the park on that side of the park.

    And those numbers apply just to last year (2012 was more spread out where 2010 was similar to 2013).

    http://www.hittrackeronline.com/deta...3&type=pitcher
    Last edited by Alex; 12-01-2013 at 09:24 AM.

  6. This user likes Alex's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    Dance with Disco Dan (12-01-2013)

  7. #86
    Quote Originally Posted by SpiritofVodkaDave View Post
    If things break right, 2014 may not be a lost cause...
    I think that depends on what people consider a "lost cause." There are an awful lot of young guys - Sano, Meyer, Gibson, Hicks, Arcia and possibly Buxton - that would have to come up and play with the consistency and maturity of vets to sniff at the playoffs. The reality is that at least some of those guys will have bumps in the road as they adjust to the league.

    I don't need this team to be in the playoff hunt in September for the season to be a success.

  8. #87
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    215
    Like
    11
    Liked 33 Times in 19 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex View Post
    I don't disagree about the OF defense, but giving up HR to RH/LH batters does not tell you where those HR went. Of his 24 HR last season, just six landed in the left field seats. Every other HR was from CF to RF.

    Now sadly, if you overlay Target Field, supposedly that only takes away one HR. Not sure how accurate that overlay is and it can't take into account the colder weather or other conditions --if there are any -- in Target Field (air currents) that may be more likely keeping balls in the park on that side of the park.

    http://www.hittrackeronline.com/deta...3&type=pitcher
    In 2012 most of his homeruns were pulled:
    http://www.hittrackeronline.com/deta...6&type=pitcher
    Of the 24 HR he gave up to RH hitters (6.1% of PAs), 20 were pulled to LF.

    In 2013, the 11 RH HRs he gave up (3.9% of PAs), it was more of a 50-50 split - 6 to LF and 5 to RF.

    I'm not sure what to make of the 2012-2013 difference. It could just be sample size issues. I did hear that he added slider to his repertoire in 2013. Maybe that allowed him to be more effective at suppressing RH pull HRs.

  9. #88
    Quote Originally Posted by mk View Post
    I like the move. The situation reminds me a lot of Kyle Lohse. Good stuff but never really put it together with the Twins. Lohse moved on at age 27 and with the change of scenery had a very good career.
    This comp perked me up. How nice would it be if we were on the other end of a Kyle Lohse type turnaround?

    The way I see it, we were not going to contend even if the 2nd SP was Kershaw. Nolasco and Hughes are a good bridge strategy. Let’s hope Gibson has a great sophomore season and Meyer comes on mid-season and pitches to his ceiling. They could replace Correia next year with one of the top of the rotation guys that should be available. Then you have …

    Shields / Bailey / etc
    Meyer
    Gibson
    Nolasco
    Hughes / Deduno / Worley

    It is not too far-fetched to believe we could be back in contention by 2015. If Hughes comes on like Lohse, Nolasco could be our #5. We are a long way from that scenario playing out. Gibson and Meyer have to reach their potential too but it is light at the end of what was a long/dark dark tunnel.

  10. This user likes Major Leauge Ready's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    raindog (12-01-2013)

  11. #89
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    978
    Like
    3
    Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by markos View Post
    In 2012 most of his homeruns were pulled:
    http://www.hittrackeronline.com/deta...6&type=pitcher
    Of the 24 HR he gave up to RH hitters (6.1% of PAs), 20 were pulled to LF.

    In 2013, the 11 RH HRs he gave up (3.9% of PAs), it was more of a 50-50 split - 6 to LF and 5 to RF.

    I'm not sure what to make of the 2012-2013 difference. It could just be sample size issues. I did hear that he added slider to his repertoire in 2013. Maybe that allowed him to be more effective at suppressing RH pull HRs.
    I added this caveat in a later edit, not as specifically, but I also pointed out that his 2010 numbers were very similar to 2013. 2011 there really wasn't much data. But the point was simply looking at it from RHB/LHB perspective isn't enough to say how Target Field would affect it.

  12. #90
    Senior Member MVP
    Posts
    5,713
    Like
    1,159
    Liked 564 Times in 369 Posts
    Now sign Ellsburry, and my blueprint pretty much comes true. No idea if either pitcher will work out, but they went out and tried to get better. That is a good thing.

  13. This user likes mike wants wins's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    Oldgoat_MN (12-01-2013)

  14. #91
    Owner MVP Brock Beauchamp's Avatar
    Posts
    8,112
    Twitter
    @rocketpig76
    Like
    49
    Liked 1,588 Times in 825 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6
    I gave the Twins about a 10% chance of picking up either Nolasco or Hughes. Picking up both was out of the question.

  15. #92
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer Oldgoat_MN's Avatar
    Posts
    666
    Like
    199
    Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Like several others, I would have liked to see the LH Kazmir.

    Nonetheless, I have to say I am more than a little shocked. Absolutely did not expect this much true effort.

    Think I'll go make some gravy to go with my crow.
    I'm on a whiskey diet. I've lost 3 days already.

  16. #93
    Senior Member Triple-A Reider's Avatar
    Posts
    377
    Like
    224
    Liked 115 Times in 73 Posts
    I really like Terry Ryan's aggressiveness this off season. Signing a couple of starting pitchers made sense. The $ was available and the Twins needed starting pitching in the worst way. Maybe Nolasco and Hughes will turn out, maybe they won't. But at the end of the day, you can't fault Terry Ryan for his effort this off season. I'm sure Nolasco will be just fine and Hughes has age and new scenery on his side.

    Signing one more pitcher wouldn't hurt, but I'd be okay if they called it an off season. I also feel indifferent on signing a positional player. I'm fine with a Pinto/Herrmann/Doumit combo at catcher, but I'd also be okay with Pinto backing up AJ or Salty. Either way, I'm feeling a bit better about 2014 and beyond knowing that Terry Ryan isn't going to sit on his hands.

  17. #94
    Pencil me down for shocked as well. It may not be the two pitchers that I would of picked (what do I know anyways), but this is pretty much what I wanted them to do. They got two pitchers that should at least stop the pitching staff from being a total disaster and did not mortgage the future by giving up prospects or draft picks. I can not remember the last time the Twins did what fans wanted. Signing Joe Mauer I guess, but it's still rare.

  18. #95
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer mikeee's Avatar
    Posts
    777
    Like
    18
    Liked 36 Times in 24 Posts
    Wow! This will be an exciting year.
    I will have to check in here more often to keep up with all the moves.

  19. #96
    Senior Member All-Star Winston Smith's Avatar
    Posts
    1,287
    Like
    82
    Liked 332 Times in 162 Posts
    With Morneau, Carroll, Blackburn and Pelfrey off the books they still haven't matched last years payroll. Still plenty of money and work to do! Don't stop now!

  20. This user likes Winston Smith's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    whydidnt (12-01-2013)

  21. #97
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    498
    Like
    2
    Liked 80 Times in 50 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by SpiritofVodkaDave View Post
    If things break right, 2014 may not be a lost cause...
    After adding Nolasco and Hughes, the Twins are a 90 loss team. Just goes to show how bad things were before they were signed, and how far left there is to go.

  22. #98
    Senior Member All-Star cmathewson's Avatar
    Posts
    2,272
    Like
    241
    Liked 462 Times in 291 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    I'm not sure they're done with signing guys. By my calculations, they still have around $28 M to spend on a catcher and another arm. I don't think the catcher will be that expensive.

    But I do like Hughes' upside. Not only because of park effects but also defense. Even the best pitchers struggle with Derek Jeter at short and Curtis Granderson in center. Since he's not a huge strikeout guy, he'll need to get more outs behind him. And I expect him to do so with the Twins.

  23. #99
    I really think Deduno is a long shot for this year. I really like the Hughes and Nolasco signings. That being said I don't think this team, even if everything goes perfect, and they make the playoffs, will ever win in the post season following the baseball philosophies of Gardy and Andy.

  24. #100
    They aren't really planning to keep Florimon as the starting SS, are they?

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.