Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 125

Thread: Article: The Case For Brett Anderson

  1. #1
    The King In The North All-Star Nick Nelson's Avatar
    Posts
    1,623
    Like
    5
    Liked 65 Times in 24 Posts
    Blog Entries
    292

    Article: The Case For Brett Anderson


  2. #2
    Senior Member All-Star Winston Smith's Avatar
    Posts
    1,100
    Like
    44
    Liked 137 Times in 74 Posts
    Any guess as to what it would cost in prospects?

  3. #3
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    4,609
    Like
    512
    Liked 214 Times in 147 Posts
    I don't know that anyone is saying he's not worth a risk, the question is, what risk/cost?

  4. #4
    Senior Member Big-Leaguer
    Posts
    758
    Like
    7
    Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Would depend on the price, and I would want a timeframe for an extension to be signed. Giving away much for 2 years is not worth it, especially when you don't rate to contend this upcoming year.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Triple-A Monkeypaws's Avatar
    Posts
    468
    Like
    35
    Liked 56 Times in 33 Posts
    Billy Beane is no dummy, and prying him away from Oakland wouldn't be cheap, regardless of health issues.

    It is a classic high risk/high reward proposition.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Triple-A
    Posts
    296
    Like
    75
    Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4
    Lottery tickets are cheap for a reason. Oakland can have someone from our bullpen not named Perkins and a middling prospect (not in our top 15 or so), but I wouldn't feel good about most anything else. His last injury doesn't look like the kind of thing that should have a lasting effect on his pitching, but even so he's barely pitched recently.

  7. #7
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    3,794
    Like
    26
    Liked 317 Times in 189 Posts
    Blog Entries
    198
    Prospects prospects prospects. You know at some point you got to trade them when high enough, otherwise they become what the Twins' minor league pitcher of the year award winners (other than Gibson) became.

    I have no issue trading any tradeable (ie. Steward, Eades, Gonsalves are not) prospect not named Sano, Meyer or Buxton for Anderson. Funny enough, the Twins are having a jam of RHSP in their prospect ranks and it is certain that some of them will not pan out. May, Berrios, Felix Jorge, et al. You got Meyer, Gibson, Nolasco and Hughes ahead of them, so you got to trade them when they still have value...
    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  8. #8
    Member Rookie
    Posts
    33
    Like
    5
    Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by ericchri View Post
    Lottery tickets are cheap for a reason. Oakland can have someone from our bullpen not named Perkins and a middling prospect (not in our top 15 or so), but I wouldn't feel good about most anything else. His last injury doesn't look like the kind of thing that should have a lasting effect on his pitching, but even so he's barely pitched recently.
    After getting Gregerson I'm not sure how interested in bullpen help they'll be. Maybe something like Santana and Melotakis...

  9. #9
    Super Moderator All-Star
    Posts
    3,415
    Like
    167
    Liked 309 Times in 184 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    20M in committements have to be factored into this too. This really is selling low for Beane, which is something he doesn't do much. I have a hard time thinking his value will be worse next year than it is right now (which honestly is likely a major league reliever or a C+ level prospect). If he has another injury plagued season, the value wont' change. If he doesn't, it likely will. So here's what I would ask. Would you trade a prospect like Adam Walker, who strikes me as a boom or bust guy in the majors and is likely redundant in this system for a guy like Anderson with the hopes of locking him up long term if he rebounds? Something tells me Beane is floating this, but he's not going to take a Jarrod Burton or Casey Fein.

  10. #10
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    3,794
    Like
    26
    Liked 317 Times in 189 Posts
    Blog Entries
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by diehardtwinsfan View Post
    . So here's what I would ask. Would you trade a prospect like Adam Walker, who strikes me as a boom or bust guy in the majors and is likely redundant in this system for a guy like Anderson with the hopes of locking him up long term if he rebounds?.
    In a heartbeat.

    But not sure that this would be enough
    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  11. #11
    Member Single-A
    Posts
    50
    Like
    4
    Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    I haven't been as high on the Anderson talk as a lot around here, but the more I hear about it and the more I read I get more interested. I think I would do Adam Walker for Anderson...depending on who else is in that deal. But the idea of getting a possible ace lefty in his mid 20s is pretty enticing. I'm with Thrylos on trading some prospects while we have em. Can't keep them all, just have to make sure you trade the right pieces. But I think this would be a huge addition for the Twins.

  12. #12
    Senior Member All-Star
    Posts
    1,532
    Like
    0
    Liked 70 Times in 48 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by mike wants wins View Post
    I don't know that anyone is saying he's not worth a risk, the question is, what risk/cost?
    Pretty much this. Anderson would be a great lottery ticket but you buy lottery tickets because they are cheap. Everything depends on the asking cost.

  13. #13
    I think anything aside from Sano, Buxton, Stewart or Meyer, the Twins need to strongly consider this trade. I have to imagine a trade of Berrios, Taylor Rogers, and Tonkin could get this done. But, who knows with Beane. I'm VERY hesistant to trade Lewis Thorpe or Gonsvalves but at the same time, they are very far away.

  14. #14
    You know Beane will ask for a young pitcher in ANY deal. That's how they always have a well oiled stable of pitchers. They traded Dan Haren for Brett Anderson (and 7 others - including Carlos Gonzalez). Gio Gonzalez was traded for Tommy Milone. Trevor Cahill was traded for Jarrod Parker. That's what I worry about...I'm worried they will try and poach our SPs from the Single-A level and that they know more than we know. I guess it shows the trust I have in the Twin's brass to evaluating pitching talent

  15. This user likes Smcginnity's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner:

    Monkeypaws (12-06-2013)

  16. #15
    Senior Member All-Star Thrylos's Avatar
    Posts
    3,794
    Like
    26
    Liked 317 Times in 189 Posts
    Blog Entries
    198
    Quote Originally Posted by Smcginnity View Post
    I think anything aside from Sano, Buxton, Stewart or Meyer, the Twins need to strongly consider this trade. I have to imagine a trade of Berrios, Taylor Rogers, and Tonkin could get this done. But, who knows with Beane. I'm VERY hesistant to trade Lewis Thorpe or Gonsvalves but at the same time, they are very far away.
    Cannot trade Gonsalves (or Stewart for that matter) until a year after they signed... Late summer
    -----
    Blogging Twins since 2007 at The Tenth Inning Stretch
    http://tenthinningstretch.blogspot.com/
    twitter: @thrylos98

  17. #16
    Junior Member Rookie SouthDakotaFarmer's Avatar
    Posts
    13
    Like
    0
    Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Beane also loves cash. Check his history and he almost always gets his trading parter to send some cash considerations in the deal. Adam Walker, Tonkin, and cash could work. Who knows though. As Mcginnity said above, Beane loves to stockpile young SP. So, with that said I imagine my proposal wouldn't work without a Low-A SP in the deal. Crap, I typed all of that for nothing I guess.

  18. #17
    Owner MVP Seth Stohs's Avatar
    Posts
    5,924
    Like
    41
    Liked 202 Times in 106 Posts
    Blog Entries
    515
    I think that Brett Anderson is equivalent to what Ricky Nolasco is in terms of potential, but he does come with higher injury risk (at least in theory). He is I would be fine with him being part of the rotation, but this conversation is correct. It's completely about what the Twins have to give up.

    It's not going to be a package of guys like Walker and Santana and relief pitchers. I mean, those guy may be included, but it will take a Rosario, Kepler, Berrios type as the starting point, and likely will take 3 more.

    Billy Beane will ask for Sano, Buxton and Meyer... Terry Ryan will say no. And then the negotiations will begin.

  19. #18
    I would like almost any trade involving Rosario (as hard as that may be right now), and one or maybe 2 of our bullpen guys. The only guys I would not be happy about trading is swarzak and Perk. I feel like the two of them are key to that bullpen being what it is. But if Kepler, Meyer, May, Sano, or Buxton are involved...shut the door in Beanes face.

  20. #19
    Senior Member Triple-A Steve Lein's Avatar
    Posts
    434
    Like
    8
    Liked 20 Times in 9 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Walker isn't going to land him as a frontrunner in a deal. It would have to start with a Rosario, Kepler, Berrios type, and then Walker as one of the other pieces.

  21. #20
    Senior Member Double-A
    Posts
    158
    Like
    11
    Liked 22 Times in 20 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Seth Stohs View Post
    I think that Brett Anderson is equivalent to what Ricky Nolasco is in terms of potential, but he does come with higher injury risk (at least in theory). He is I would be fine with him being part of the rotation, but this conversation is correct. It's completely about what the Twins have to give up.

    It's not going to be a package of guys like Walker and Santana and relief pitchers. I mean, those guy may be included, but it will take a Rosario, Kepler, Berrios type as the starting point, and likely will take 3 more.

    Billy Beane will ask for Sano, Buxton and Meyer... Terry Ryan will say no. And then the negotiations will begin.
    I don't see how any pitcher who's averaged just over 50 innings a year for 3 years can command that much in a trade. That and the fact his innings these last three years weren't that amazing. I'd love to get him but just don't see any team giving up multiple prospects for him. Now if they keep him and he has a hot first half and they trade him at the deadline then yes. But right now I just don't see any team giving up more than C level prospects for him. Maybe one B level and that's it, even that I just don't see any teams paying up that much for him with the injury history.

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
©2014 TwinsCentric, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Interested in advertising with Twins Daily? Click here.