01-12-2014, 08:23 PM #121
- Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Levisthan: it could be some of us place more weight on what we saw and were aware of over Jack Morris' career rather than a comparison of stats.
That is valid too. Consider since the beginning of MLB time the baseball people made their player decisions without any metrics. Can anyone imagine Ozzie Guillen or Jim Leyland pouring over metrics to make their player decisions?
That is not to discount metrics, only to say there are different ways of coming to conclusions. After all, for most of us baseball is entertainment and these are only opinions.
That JM had a high ERA is a fact and that it is higher than most in the HOF is also a fact. Whether they are serious enough to disqualify HOF membership is an opinion. I think he belongs.
01-12-2014, 08:47 PM #122
If you want to romanticize beyond the stats - that's fine. But romanticizing a player's value in direct contrast to the stats is an issue. As the link Brock posted above demonstrates - there is a LOT of that in play with Morris for whatever reason.
01-12-2014, 08:54 PM #123"If you'da been thinkin' you wouldn't 'a thought that.."
01-12-2014, 09:36 PM #124
01-12-2014, 10:17 PM #125
01-13-2014, 07:04 AM #126
- Liked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Glavine made it in on his first ballot. Other than pitching 4 years longer, what did Glavine do that was better than Mussina? Wins are a team stat. Cy Young awards are a popularity contest. Mussina had the audacity to retire when he was still good, Glavine did not. Cy Young awards are votes based on a subjective opinion on who had the best year, see 1998 Cy Young results. The only thing Glavine did better than Brown or Maddux was win more games. For a career Gavine won 35 more games than Mussina. That was enough to get 409 more HOF votes. What made his career better than Mussina's? A team stat and a beauty contest.
There are no individual benchmarks for pitchers other than 300 wins, except if you are Roger Clemons. After Randy Johnson and Mariano Rivera get in there might not be another pitcher for a while.
When you look at Morris's career, he never won a beauty contest, he wore out before he could get to 300 wins. He was over the time he pitched one of the best for durability and consistency. He pitched 2 teams to WS wins. In the end, not quite enough.
Last edited by old nurse; 01-13-2014 at 07:18 AM.
01-13-2014, 09:23 AM #127
My point was that if you are trusting your romanticized bias of a player over (and especially in direct contradiction to) stats, there is an issue with your reasoning. Especially if you're lobbing that kind of accusation around.
01-17-2014, 10:04 AM #128
- Liked 139 Times in 94 Posts
the thing about observation bias and MLB is this.....
Did anyone that "saw" how great a player was really watch all 162 games for all the teams? If not, how do you know he was better w/o using measurment?Lighten up Francis....
This user likes mike wants wins's post and wants to buy him/her a steak dinner: